Board Game Reviews, Gaming Articles

Preview: War Room by Larry Harris

FULL REVIEW BY GAMERSDUNGEON HERE

In the world of board gaming there are some games that almost transcend the hobby and reach out to popular culture to a point where a game can become a house hold name, something even your parents will likely recognize, something you can find on the bookshelf of your average joe. Games like RISK, Monopoly, Battleship and Stratego are some examples that spring to mind.

For people in the hobby of board gaming however there are other titles that have similar sentimentalities and are almost synonymous with board gaming history. These games might not transcend the hobby but they inspire the word “classic” and find common ground into conversations of your typical hobbyist. You would be hard pressed to find a board gamer out there who would not refer to the world war II grand strategy game of Axis and Allies as such a classic. The most popular of the Milton Bradly masters series games, Axis and Allies is for a great many old school board gamers one of their first experiences that broke them out of what is generally the accepted mass market board game lists. Most people have likely played RISK at some point in their life, but Axis and Allies was the cross over game for many that almost defined a persons transition from someone who sometimes plays board games to someone who is a board gamer.

You would be hard pressed to meet anyone in the world who hasn’t at least heard of RISK the board game, it’s almost on the same level as Chess or Poker, its embedded in global culture.

The guy we have to thank for Axis and Allies is Larry Harris Jr., a board game designer who unlike so many designers out there spent nearly a lifetime trying to perfect one game. Sure he designed a few others (not trying to sound dismissive here), but over the last 30+ years Larry Harris has tinkered with Axis and Allies almost exclusively, creating variations on the game and trying to perfect the original version. It is very clearly a labor of love and In interviews when he talks about Axis and Allies he doesn’t speak as a person who made a game for others to buy, but a guy who made what he viewed as the perfect world war II game that he wants to play himself. He designed Axis and Allies for him and his friends and as a gesture of good will let everyone else get a copy as well.

Axis and Allies has had many versions, variations (both official and fan made). In the war game hobby, it’s largely considered both a beloved classic and a design triumph.

It’s important to understand this aspect of Larry Harris because it is very rare for him to design and release something other then Axis and Allies. In fact designers of his caliber and attitude towards perfection are quite rare. When Larry Harris announced that he was making a new version of Axis and Allies, aka his dream project of an even larger and more epic version of the game, well, lets just say for us old school gronards and Axis and Allies fans this was the news of the century.

That game was finally kickstarted back in 2019 and found its way to table tops in 2020. That game is called War Room and today I’m going to talk a bit about why this game is so special and why anyone who loves the old classics like Axis and Allies should be paying attention.

War Room is a massive game in size and scale, but is in large part much easier to learn to play then Axis and Allies thanks largely to some very clever handling of certain elements like stress and production. It’s also a highly engaged game where most phases of the game are executed by all players simultaneously with teams cooperating.

Why Axis and Allies was so popular

Before we can talk about why we should be excited about War Room we need to talk about Larry’s first love, Axis and Allies and why it was such a popular game.

The thing you have to understand about the early days of the hobby is that their was a very clean divide in board gaming both as a hobby as as a design between games that were for the masses like Battleship, RISK or Monopoly and then there were games for gamers, things you probobly have never heard of like Rise and Decline of the Third Reich, or Ambush. Essentially the world of board gaming was divided between people who were making games they thought they could sell and people who made games for “gronards”, those beard scratching old fogies’ who believe games needed to be simulations of something and historically accurate. Games with 100 page rulebooks that complicated the shit to a point no reasonable human being could ever be expected to understand how to play and required a masters degree in English comprehension.

Axis and Allies among a few other games that should but won’t be mentioned changed all that. It was one of the first games that was released that had a manageable amount of rules that you could reasonably expect anyone to understand, while at the same time having that deep strategy and historical relevance of a game that old gronards would appreciate it. Larry broke the barrier between popular culture gamers and simulationist/historical war gamers. He gave us a crossover game that went beyond the simplicity of a dice chucker like risk and included the high level play of games like Third Reich which were the exclusive stomping grounds of veteran historical war gamers to that point.

“Chit” games are a style of game where many of the units and properties of the game are tracked via cardboard chits. These games tend to have a reputation for both being complex and fiddly, while not being particularly visually appealing.

Is the “Chit” game reputation well deserved? Perhaps. Games like Empire of the Sun laid out on the table certainly does not have the same visual sexapeal as modern games populated by miniatures and the complexity of the game is quite extreme.

For many, myself included, Axis and Allies invited you into a whole new branch of board gaming without making you feel stupid and that was both an achievement of design but also of production. Larry Harris understood the secret of games like RISK. It wasn’t that they were simple, it was that they looked amazing on the table top. Truth is that generally speaking, people are smart enough to figure out complex games but most gamers really don’t want to stair at ugly game boards and chits for 10 hours when playing one. Being a good game was simply not good enough, it needed some sex appeal.

Presentation was important, he understood that games were also toys and that people played games for the experience, not just for the deep strategy. He understood that war games in particular were about inspiring the imagination, giving players a sense that they commanded armies, that they were in charge of a grand strategy. He understood that games needed to inspire a feeling and a lot of that came from visuals.

More importantly however Larry Harris understood how far you could go with the rules before it was too far, too complicated, while at the same time, what within those rules would inspire conversation about strategy. Ask any Axis and Allies player how one wins the game with the Axis powers and you will discover that no two players will ever fully agree despite 40+ years of gaming analysis. The game wasn’t perfectly balanced by any stretch of the imagination, but what it was, was a game that said “hey, you can’t win as the Axis powers, I dare you to try”. It posed a challenge to players and this with its visual appeal has driven the success of the game for so many years.

The Problems With Axis and Allies

Suffice to say Axis and Allies despite being a stone cold classic to board gamers around the world for 40+ years, it had one key issue that most would generally agree on. A problem that actually most war games have, the hidden information problem.

The problem most war games have is that in an actual war, commanders and generals had no idea what the enemy was going to do. They would build strategies trying to predict their enemy and execute those strategies hoping they guessed right. This is a core premise that is very difficult to translate to board games and always had, commonly known as the fog of war.

Typically what happens in a board game is that one player makes a move, the other player see’s the move and then responds with a strategy accordingly. A strategy not based on the state of the game at the start of the turn, but at the end of his opponents turn. This is how it worked in most board games about war (and still does for the most part), especially Axis and Allies where a player would complete their entire turn before an opponent would act, resulting in full information disclosure about the activities on the board.. This however is never how actual wars take place, the kind of information you get from watching an opponent “make a move” would never actually be available to you in a real combat situation. You would have to give orders to your troops and put a plan in motion long before you ever got to see what your enemy was planning and you would be committed to that plan (too late to change your mind). This is what often made wars so messy, fog of war is a real thing.

War Room addresses this and I have to believe Larry Harris understood that this “information problem” was one of the key design issues with Axis and Allies that would result in the game being kind of predictable at times. Players could try different strategies, but those strategies would be revealed before opponents had to commit to any decisions in response. Hence like chess, you make your move based on the information of the opponents last move.

At the core of the War Room design, the game addresses this issue by using a method that strangely enough has been around for decades in another popular stone cold classic game called Diplomacy. The concept of hidden orders that are written down and submitted simultaneously by all participants, then executed in a turn order defined by a bidding process. This brilliant albeit very well known little design is one of the key elements to War Rooms core mechanic, notably addressing one of the key issues with Axis and Allies and in my humble opinion, one of the best evolutions of Axis and Allies.

Hidden movement/orders appears in quite a few modern games as well, many of which have broken my top 10 lists so I’m clearly a fan. Games like Game of Thrones the board game for example make excellent use of hidden simultaneous orders as just one example.

The Things That Make War Room Awesome

Ok so now that we have laid the foundation of the conversation we can talk about the game itself and there is a lot to cover here so enjoy the wall of text.

War Room as a game hangs on five core concepts.

Team Game

One of the big issues with games that have a 6+ hour timeline, in particular grand strategy games is that it’s very possible, in fact likely that some players will be eliminated from contention for the win half way through the game or perhaps even very early in the game. Those players are then forced to sit through hours of play with really nothing to drive them to care. They are going to lose and they will know that for 6 to 8+ hours.

This is one of the biggest issues with big board game classics like Twilight Imperium or Advanced Civilization for example. Long games you can effectively be eliminated from hours before the game will end.

War Room tackles this issue in a very simple and meaningful way. Its a team game. Axis vs. Allies. Your nation might be doing poorly and your contribution in the war may be limited, but you are part of a team trying to win the game together and hence, participating in creating the strategy that will hopefully help your team win.

This keeps everyone involved regardless of the situation of any given player. Its a very simple but very clever approach to solving this issue.

Hidden Action Sequence

In its most simplest form, each player for each nation they control, writes down the orders he wishes to execute for his units. Each player has a limited amount of orders they can give, hence they must choose wisely. Its important to understand that going into this sequence not being 100% certain of the turn order can be very troublesome to any planning. Part of creating the orders is bidding on the turn order with the very precious oil resources, one of the most important resources in the game.

In War Room you will execute more than just your movement/attack orders, your production choices are also hidden, another great addition to the fog of war effect.

This key design is what drives gameplay and I think is one of the more ingenious ways of handling what can often be a part of the game that creates a lot of downtime. Here all players simultaneously create their orders, teams working together on their strategy also creates a level of collaboration. In a sense it creates a great atmosphere at the table and I believe it to be one of the things that makes this game truly distinct from many other world war II games.

The Stress System

Another rather ingenious approach to design here, one of the key issues with area control war games is that often it really just boils down to who wins in key moments, or who has the most units on the board. It can be difficult in games like this to make an impact on an enemy who is clearly already winning the war. The stress system is how War Room attacks this problem.

It’s a very simple system. Anytime you lose a territory with a strategic value (which is most of them) or take a loss in units, you gain stress and as your stress reaches certain threshold you begin taking penalties to your resources and your ability to wage war.

The stress mechanic has a number of effects on the game, but the main one is that it drives the end game. Nations become worn down and eventually lose their will to fight leading to a natural conclusion of the game.

What this means in the scope of the game is that your can’t simply make a B-line for the victory conditions of the game focusing your entire army in one place, you must consider the world map as a whole and defend your positions or suffer under the weight of mini snipe attacks and watch your nation become worn down by stress even out of a winning position. The game doesn’t become about that one key battle or key strategic area, but the many battles around the world, each a potential stress point that can lead to the slow degraded performance of the whole nation.

Tactics Matter

One aspect of grand strategy games is that they zoom out very far to handle the scope of the game, which often results in the battle resolution systems being rather watered down abstractions, leaving you with a feeling that battle resolution is just pure luck of the die. Its a strange contradiction, where you play a 8+ hour game about a grand strategy but the actual individual battles boil down to a single roll of a D10 for example (I’m looking at you Empire of the Sun).

In War Room tactics actually matter. What units you bring to bare in a fight and how you decide to position them on the battlefield can turn a battle you might have lost into one you may win.

The battle board does slow the pacing of the game down as each battle on the board must be resolved individually but this creates an atmosphere that makes the game feel like a genuine war. Each battle becomes a mini event and though the game can still hinge on wild die results, you can do quite a bit with your tactical positioning to control the results of a battle.

The tactics board adds an element of focus to the game where battles become a feature rather then after thought of the grand strategy game. This is arguably the most controversial addition to the game as it does slow down the overall experience and is likely what leads the game into that 8+ rather then 5+ playtime.

If your more aggressive you may take bigger loses but you will also cause more casualties. You may know that a battle is lost, but may then focus on shooting down planes of your enemies to hurt their ability to project power in the future. Just a couple of ways where tactics and grand strategy come together in War Room.

Vulnerable Industry/Resources

War is about resources and one of the keys to any grand strategy game is the ability to attack your enemies supply lines, blow up their industrial centers to hurt their production and shutdown their transportation systems to hurt their mobility.

All of this is considered in War Room and all players must deal with the fact that they have vulnerabilities all over the map where they produce units and the method by which they transport them. Your factories can be bombed, your convoys transporting precious resources can be attacked, your rail lines can be bombed destroying your ability to move troops in your own territory.

This key addition helps the game become about something more then just taking territory, edging the generally simple gameplay into more complex strategies. To win, you want to crush your enemies ability to produce units and so attacking their resources is not only a viable strategy, it’s often the key to victory from a weaker position.

General Insight

To me War Room appears to be a game that tries to be both a war game for the deep strategist, while a fun event game for the enthusiasts without underwhelming one, while overwhelming the other. I think mileage may vary here, but as a fan of games like Empire of the Sun and Paths of Glory, I don’t find the rules and strategies of this game to be underwhelming and given my local groups play games like Game of Thrones and even Twilight Imperium on occasion, I don’t see why they would struggle with the rules of War Room.

It remains to be seen however if an 8 hour war game about World War II is captivating enough for my gaming group to keep their attention. I know that with my gaming group, if they love a game 8+ hours is not a problem. We play RPG’s like Vampire: The Masquerade and miniature games like Songs of Ice and Fire that extend well past that play time on a regular basis and I don’t hear anyone complaining.

For me personally I see War Room as less a game in the strictest terms and more of a fun event that can be run a couple of times a year. To me, event games like Advanced Civilization, Twilight Imperium and Game of Thrones the Board Game are always the most memorable games in my gaming history. I don’t play them often, in fact, some I don’t play for years at a time, but when we do, its amazing and I hope War Room will be yet another addition to that glorious history of gaming events.

From a presentation angle War Room is absolutely gorgeous on the table. It screams play me, being huge, bright and exciting to be around. I love games that inspire the imagination and give you a sense of time and place, a game that gives you a role to play and makes you feel like the whole thing is part of a larger experience that extends beyond the game. I believe War Room to be such a game.

Finally I would argue that the game manages to be huge in size, epic in scale and visually appealing while not being fiddly. To me this is a big deal when it comes to selling the concept to my fellow gamers. Realistically speaking in our group we have a lot of games competing for our table time and shelf space, so we get quite picky about what we are willing to invest in. This is particularly true when we are talking about the big event games as we already have quite a few very established favorites. War Rooms sexy size and visual component combined with its epic scale and simultaneous action phases I think will all contribute to my groups adoption as a new member of this rather exclusive club, but that initial play experience is going to be critical to its long term success. Games like this typically only get one shot to impress, but I do believe War Room has the nuts and bolts to pull it off.

Board Game Reviews, Gaming Articles

Paths of Glory by GMT Games

When I made my top 10 war games list last year I had just acquired Paths of Glory, played it once and though I was instantly in love with the concept, it was a game that I was yet to truly explore. Since then I have put quite a few games under my belt thanks to an amazing online community supporting the game and I’m at a point now where I think its time to give this one a proper review.

Paths of Glory falls into the CDG (Card Driven Games) category of war games which is a very specific albeit popular style of design in the spirit of giants like Twilight Struggle, Washington’s War and Empire of The Sun. All amazing games in their own right, but Paths of Glory even among this list of exceptional games has its own take on the concept and more importantly it covers a subject (World War I) with such class and elegance that it will take you from a person who neither knows or cares about World War I history to an absolute WWI history buff.

I think on a high level, Paths of Glory is broken down into three very distinct core game elements. The card driven mechanic which is the coveted link to the historical events of World War I and a key driver to the game. The tactical war on the main map which is a point to point system in which players jockey for position and fight for domination in the WWI theatre. Finally you have management of war resources abstracted in a wide variety of ways that give the game that tight, attrition feel WWI is so famous for.

Put them together and what you have is a game that is all about tension, attrition, and players trying to squeeze out every inch of blood, sweat and tears to get that breakthrough moment where one side collapses. Yet its also a game of massive comebacks where a single event can trigger huge swings in the war and this really leads the game to being a game about a story of the game. It gives it that re-writing history feeling and this is something you really notice when you have played several games and can make a comparison between different experiences with it.

The question that remains is do I like it and probobly from that very high level overview you may rightfully conclude that I do, however I think it has its own character and the real question is whether or not this is a game for you.

Overview

Final Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star(3.7) Great Game!

Paths of Glory is a two player game that will quite easily take about 6 to 8 hours to play. This is a long, heavy and fairly complex game with considerable amount of rules in its 34 page rulebook that comes with a fair amount of special cases and exception rules that will take quite a while for you to get your head around. You will spend several games learning how to play before you get it right and its going to take ten times as many games to learn to play the game well.

Players pick one of two sides of the war (Central Powers or Allied Powers) and starting in August of 1914 with the historical event known as “The Guns of August” the war kicks off with something of a slow burn.

The system tries to be historically accurate about the war and in that regard World War I wasn’t some big bang event, its something that continued to escalate over time slowly as more and more resources are dedicated towards the imperialistic efforts of key nations triggering more more countries to join the fight.

There are also mechanics that deal with the politics of the war, shining through in the card play but also key mechanics like mandated offensives which helps to illustrate that the war was not just run by generals making strategic decisions on the battlefield, but by global powers who even when being on the same side had political frictions and infighting. It’s a game about maneuvering events as much as it is about actual tactical warfare.

War itself is also quite difficult to predict, battles that seem like easy wins, stall, battles you thought would be attritions go surprisingly well. Their is a cadence here that feels like luck, but is more about being consistent with your planning. You can’t count on winning any one battle, but its about wearing down your opponent, tapping their resources and constantly pushing on them until something breaks.

Running the war in Paths of Glory, much as it must have been historically was about maneuvering around the many events that pushed the war in a direction that favors your plans, but because the game is a back and forth (You take a turn I take a turn), your plans are often spoiled by the action of your opponent to which you must urgently respond. While the war isn’t going to be won by the results of a single battle, every battle that does take place creates opportunities or emergencies that need to be dealt with quickly.

The whole game although its a slow, attrition, has a constant sense of urgency. You have a feeling that on your turn, with that one action and limited resources you have, you need to do a dozen things but end up only being able to do one. The feeling of having an endless stream of vulnerabilities all over the map creates a kind of stress and pressure, creating tension that climaxes slowly over time. At the same time you can create these emergencies for your opponent which forces them to be distracted by your activities elsewhere in the world.

There are these moments of recovery where the players have an unspoken agreement that the fighting has been too intense, neither side feeling comfortable enough to push forward resulting in a sort of recovery period and then there are moments when the fighting is so intense its almost like to wild barbarians swinging at each other with no regard to the possible consequences.

The map is big and busy, there is a lot of stuff going on here and the truth is that you can’t ignore any of it. Quite literarily every inch of this map see’s use in every game, there is no wasted space here.

It’s a fantastic representation of the historical period and works to create a great table atmosphere that only a rich and deep war game like this can provide.

The fun can and does come to sudden stop however and this is one of my complaints about the game in that their are so many exceptions and sub-rules to rules that it seems almost impossible to play the game correctly. Its easy to forget rules like if the central powers reach Limited War on the war status track, Turkey enters the war or that on turns 1 and 2 of the game you get a -2 to attacking forts. These sort of exceptions and special rules require both players to be very well versed on the rules and be vigilant about their execution because ignoring such a rule can really unbalance the game. These rules exist for both historical accuracy and perhaps more importantly to maintain a good balance between the two asymmetrical sides.

Paths of Glory is a deep strategic experience, its a game that tells a story, but that experience and that story comes as a result of the well thought out and complex rules system that drives this game. It’s a strange setup because without these rules, these special cases and exceptions, it would probobly not be as good of a game. You might be tempted to think that if they just made this game simpler, it would be better but this is not the case. It’s specifically the attention to detail that brings this game to life and it would be a lesser game without those details.

Components

Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_star

Pros:  High quality components that are almost standard from GMT these days.

Cons:  Chit tokens are tiny and handling them is a pain in the ass.

Paths of Glory has several different versions that have been printed over the years, the version I’m reviewing here today is the Deluxe 6th edition, the latest one available as of this writing.

This Deluxe edition comes with a two sided mounted gameboard that has on one side the classic original version of the map and on the other an updated more modernized version. Both are actually quite functional, but the updated version color codes the countries making it easier to quickly identify which locations on the map belong to which countries.

The quality of this mounted board is effectively the best possible, I don’t see any way to improve it. It’s sturdy, beautifully illustrated, easy to read with clear iconography. Though the map is extremely busy because so much information is on it, including all the various tracking and status boxes it can be a bit overwhelming, but everything has a purpose and it becomes second nature after a couple of plays to find everything you need.

GMT is quite famous for its card stock and quality, Paths of Glory gets the same treatment with quality so high that I’m certain it will last a lifetime of plays without wear and tear. Glossy, stiff cards that are easy to shuffle and really require no sleeves, they are that well made. The illustrations on the card depict the event of the card to such a degree that after playing the game a few times you know what the card does by looking at the picture. You really can’t ask much more of a game card then that.

The cardboard chits that make up the units of the game on the map are of great quality with legible font, they are very functional in that regard. They are chits however and are a pain in the ass to handle due to their size and the fact that you stack them on the board. Its a constant thing to have to peek under stacks and because the map is quite tight and the chits quite small, its a nuisance to handle them. This is almost universally true about all chit based war games but its particularly troublesome in Paths of Glory as its not a hex but point to point map so the chits must be placed in specific boxes that are exactly the size of the chits. One good bump can misalign all of the units and can easily ruin a game.

The chits are tiny, hard to handle and must be stacked during gameplay. I know this is a war game tradition, but yeah, I feel like a giant trying to pick up a piece of rice when playing this game. Tweezers come highly recommended.

I personally would like see these chit games use bigger maps and bigger chits because even though that may take more space and increase the cost, these games are lifetime hobby games, I don’t think players are going to mind shelling out a few extra bucks for a bigger, easier to manipulate game.

One complaint I also have about all chit games is that the chits are all very specific. For example their is a 1st army for Russia, that chit represents a specific unit in the game, linked to a specific card in the game. Lose that chit and you have a real problem and there are absolutely no spare parts in the game. You have to be really careful not to lose even a single piece in a game that has hundreds of tiny pieces the size of a finger nail. It seems almost inevitable that you will eventually loses pieces and replacing them is going to be a real pain in the ass.

I don’t know what the solution here is, but I think the best your going to do is make them bigger so your less likely to misplace them.

As a whole this is a game that looks beautiful on the table but that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I sometimes send screenshots of games in progress to my friends who roll their eyes at the tiny chits on a massive map, I don’t think they see the appeal but of course these are people who play games like Blood Rage filled with beautiful miniatures so I can understand a game with card board chits might not be as visually appealing to them.

For me personally there is nothing more gorgeous than a huge map of Europe filled with chits representing armies of thousands. Its a personal taste thing I suppose, but I think its beautiful and inspiring.

Theme

Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star

Pros:  Captures the World War I theme well… I think.

Cons:  World War I is not an easy theme to sell, its a quirky piece of history.

World War I is, well lets just say that in contemporary culture it’s something of a mystery. It’s rather strange because you can find a lot of World War II historical buffs, Napoleon Era Buffs, really almost any other historical period of conflicts will have sort of fanatics that know and are deeply engrossed by its history.

World War I for some reason is the one period in history very few people know about and when you look around the historical war game scene, their is not much out there that covers the subject.

World War I however just like any historical conflict has tremendous amount of subtle and interesting facts and events which can spark the imagination and the history nerd in all of us and Paths of Glory really tries hard to help players make that breakthrough.

It is a tough sell though and this is because a lot of the history is hard to contextualize in our modern understanding of world politics. People thought very differently during this period and the historical events really reflect that as you wonder, WHY? Like why the hell did they do this, what was the political or historical reason for it and Paths of Glory is not really trying to give you an answer, it assumes to a degree that if your interested you can look it up. Though its worth pointing out that in the rules book each card in the game has a historical factoid that explains the event in a more historical context, but you don’t really get this during gameplay.

There is a movie with a relatively young Kirk Douglass called Paths of Glory about World War I you can check out. Might help with the history a bit, but, no I have not seen it.

The end result is that it might be difficult for players to relate to the history and hence the game. Still, from what I can tell and I’m no World War I historian, this game does a fantastic job of bringing that history to life.

I found that after playing it several times I would say stuff like “man I need to get Romania into this fight” where prior to playing this game I’m not sure I could tell you much about Romania or find it on the map (I’m embarrassed to say).

You sort of get into it and its thanks to the games focus on trying to represent the WWI conflict in a less esoteric way. In a way the game tries to simplify the history a bit, not necessarly making it less about real history but more about being a game about creating your own history using real history. This is in big part because every card in the game represents a historical event, but you are not going to execute those cards in a historically accurate timing so you are creating your own version of WWI history. In this way the games subject matter becomes a bit more personalized, its not World War I, its your version of it.

None of this really distracts from the game but I do believe knowing a bit about world war I history would probobly help you to play this game better. Like knowing that Romania while being a small country with limited troops played a pivotal role in history and you get a sense of that after you played a few times. Their position on the map, is quite critical and take could very well swing the war if they enter at the right moment. Just an example but its not something that is intuitively understood just by reading of the rules.

I think I could see this game being ported to other themes and being just as interesting, perhaps even more so, however as it stands as a world war I game I think the theme works quite well even if I don’t really have a real grasp on the historical period.

Gameplay

Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star

Pros: A deep, rich experience with heavy tension and massive scope that gives you everything you want from a historical war game.

Cons: The heavy rules weight and typical 8 hour play time makes this an experience not everyone will appreciate.

Paths of Glory is a complex game, to explain the gameplay in a review article would probobly take as many pages as the actual rulebook and I doubt I could do as good of a job as the actual rulebook does.

I think I will stick to my standard policy of assuming that since this is a very deep, strategic game that part of your research into this game will include familiarizing yourself with the rules and I will instead focus on my opinion about the gameplay to hopefully illustrate what I like and don’t like about the game helping you to make a decision about whether or not to invest.

Its worth noting however that playing Paths of Glory is more than just an financial investment in the game, its a considerable time investment and I think I would put this game into the lifestyle category of games for that reason. Its not something you can just pull off the shelf, explain the rules to a friend and go. This is a game to which two people must dedicate considerable amount of time before they play to understand and learn the game, then ten times that much time to learn to play it well, not to mention the typical 6 to 8 hours it takes to actually play. There is no quick fix for that when it comes to Paths of Glory, that is what it takes and you must embrace that or you probobly should skip it.

Fortunately there is a great online community that supports this game and there are a number of youtube tutorials that can give you a pretty solid start, Harsh Rules is a really good one. In the end however their is no substitute for reading the 34 page rulebook and both you and your opponent should read it cover to cover before playing. Not the most exciting thing you’ll ever do, but it is the path, I don’t think is avoidable if you want to play this game.

Paths of Glory is a multi tier game, meaning their are several core concepts working independently, but the entire thing comes down to a relatively simple back and forth action system. Each round players will take 6 actions, going back and forth and on your turn you will play a card.

That card can be used in several ways to take several different types of actions each with its own purpose and this is where the nuts and bolts of the game center on.

Each card represents an event and these events run the gambit from being political events, reinforcement events, special combat events and more. Each is representative of a piece of history and in this lays much of the games nuanced storytelling. You execute cards representing things that actually happened in history but because your doing it in your own order of play things aren’t going to play out like they did in real history. Paths of Glory is about writing your own history of World War I and this is really the fun of the game, seeing how your version of World War I actually differs from what actually happened.

The cards are the key to the game, but they can get a bit wordy. It takes an understanding of the game to understand what the cards represent, just one more thing that adds to what is a fairly steep learning curve for the game.

Maybe in your game the Allies go on the offensive and become the aggressor, perhaps Italy joins the war much later in your version of history, or perhaps the Americans never join the war. What is the impact, how does that change history, that is where the joy of that story your creating with your opponent comes from. There is all sorts of stuff that can happen, some of it you can control, some of it you can’t.

The main thing about the event cards is trying to figure out when is the best time to execute them and in this we could have endless debates about almost every single card. This is deepened even further by the fact that each of the two asymmetrical decks (central powers and allied powers) is split into three separate periods of play, divided into Mobilization, Limited War and Total War. When these periods execute and when you gain access to those cards depend on your sides war status which is something that is driven by how you play your cards so you have some control over when these cards come into play.

Werther its a good strategy to push war status or not is a subject for debate, but it suffices to say there is a great deal of decision depth here that will have your historical war game senses tingling. I love this aspect of the game and really it stems from my general love of card driven war games, after all, Washington’s War, Twilight Struggle and Empire of the Sun are among my favorite war games and they all use a very similar mechanic.

Instead of the events on the card you can use cards for their operational value, a number typically between 1 to 5 which is a reference to the card events general impact and value. The higher the operations value the more mobility and attacks you can get on the board so sacrificing an important event with a high operations value allows you to have a big impact in the tactical war on the board. This trade off is among the toughest decisions you have to make, but it goes even further then that.

Each card also has a reinforcement point value for each nation and can be used to resurrect and heal wounded armies. This is yet another use for the cards and another point of decison.

This balancing act of choosing what cards to use, when and for what purpose is really where the core of the games strategic gameplay and player decisions comes from. Its at the heart of the game and while there are plenty of other mechanics and gameplay elements I could talk about, this is the bread butter, this is the mechanic that makes Paths of Glory the award winning game it is.

These are tough decisions you make throughout the game and for the historical war game buff, the fun of the game. You these make this decision six times per round and there are potentially 20 rounds in the game if it does not end early which means that you are making a ton of decisions all the time in this game.

What is wonderful about this game is that it’s so painful, every time, round after round, action after action, you are forced to make a call about which card to play and what to use that card for. Its a pain of joy, it gives you the feeling of command over the war and when the game is over you can trace your victory or your defeat to how you played these cards and when you played them. That “I should have played X for Y” discussion after the game will have your head spinning and looking forward to the next time you play so you can do things differently.

There is a simple battle system here that I’m not going to get too much into because it is indeed quite simple. There is of course tremendous strategy in understanding positions, your odds, controlling supply lines and various maneuvers that you can make on the map that are quite important, but these fall into what I would call standard fare for a war game. The system is point to point rather then a hex grid, so there is a sense of tightness on the map where you have to pay close attention to how different areas are connected and this can be quite tricky as it really is a maze. This however adds to rather then takes away from the strategic depth, though it does add to the complexity of the games learning curve.

To me the game is the CDG mechanic and its executed brilliantly here making for a game of tough decisions, inside of a historical layer that comes through at every turn. The game captures the attrition warfare of World War I perfectly, while making sure that the game feels tight and tense so that players are always interested in what is happening. When its done, after 8 hours of play you look back on your experience and speak of it in terms of a story about your version of World War I. Its something that’s difficult to describe, but surely is a wonderful thing.

I certainly have my beefs with the game, there are a few cards I think could be better balanced, a few rules I think dive a little deeper then the game needed it to be, there is the quirkiness of the Near East Map and a few other things. To me none of these spoil the game, in fact I would be hard pressed to point out specific things and as you play the game more and more, coming to a higher understanding of its more subtle elements you also learn to appreciate some of the things that might otherwise come off as complaints.

For example while the Near East may seem like a pointless place where nothing happens in your first few games, as you become better at the game you start to see its potential and suddenly it can be as much of a hot spot as the Eastern or Western fronts. So the learning curve doesn’t really stop with learning to play, there is a tremendous amount of depth to explore in this game and as such, the more you play the more you learn to appreciate its various quirks.

The first couple of games you might wonder what the hell the Near East Map is for, it seems irrelevant to the game, but with some experience you eventually come to realize just how critical the efforts here can be to strategies on both sides.

I think the gameplay here is executed extremely well, this is a game that clearly had a design goal that it achieved. Its educational about its historical elements, it has a deep, thinky strategy, it puts players to constant and difficult decisions and the game has an almost exhaustive tension. Its just fantastic.

Replay-ability and Longevity

Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_star

Pros: No two games will ever be alike, rich dynamics give this game infinite replay-ability.

Cons:  You need a dedicate opponent ready to play repeated games to get the most out of this game which can be tough in any gaming circle.

I will make this short and sweet because I don’t think there is much to say here. This game has infinite replayability, there are so many dynamic elements here that even though the game setup is static, the resolution of the game is anything but. Its a card driven game, what cards you draw are going to define your actions and in my experience once you get past the first round, there is no way history is going to ever repeat itself.

As far longevity, I think a lot of that comes down to your personal preferences and whether or not you can find an opponent with a matching dedication. For me, this game is on my hobby table fairly often as I play it against online opponents, but finding another player with the same interest and dedication in real life has not been easy. Its a very niche thing and I think for most people this will be something of a dust collector just because of the nature of its complexity and general difficulty to get to the table.

You need to find a like minded war gamer with the same interest and I think that goes for all games in this category.

Conclusion

Paths of Glory is a deeply rich and rewarding experience, but its also a very demanding one. This is a difficult game to learn to play and its even more difficult to learn to play well. It’s certainly not a pick up and play type of game, it requires two dedicated players ready to invest the time to learn to play and that road is long and can be a bit frustrating as the game has a tremendous amount of rules weight and is filled with special case exceptions.

If you can get past that with a buddy however this is an absolute and unquestionable king of historical war gaming. For me its right up there with some of the stone cold classics like Empire of the Sun. It’s not just a game, its an experience.

You have to understand and embrace what your getting yourself into but for those of you out there who are looking for that next historical war game addiction I can’t recommend Paths of Glory enough. It’s amazing!

Best of List, Gaming Articles

GM Theory: OSR Games You Should Be Playing

I love role-playing games, if there was such a thing as “my thing”, it would definitely be that. It should not however be a secret that I’m a card carrying member of the OSR (Old School Revival). For those in the know, the OSR is essentially a sort of loosely defined idea that in some shape or another, old school RPG’s were better then I suppose you could say new school RPG’s. Not entirely sure that is a reasonable explanation of the OSR, but I’m not here to explain what it is, I’m here to talk about some of the games that are released in the spirit of the OSR or games that proclaim themselves to be OSR games.

I do want to say that the presumption that I don’t like contemporary games or I’m some sort of Gronard because I like OSR games is far from the truth, though a common sentiment among contemporary RPG fans about the OSR. It’s a kind of strange stereotyping that takes place that if you like old school games, it means you hate new school games. This is nonsense of course, I love all sorts of role-playing games, I just happen to have my beefs with one of them which happens to be the most popular one in the world, modern, contemporary 5th edition Dungeons and Dragons. One of these days I will get to writing an article about why that is, but if you follow my blog I don’t think I hide my general distaste for the 5e ruleset. That does not however mean that I don’t like modern RPG’s, I do, my bookshelf is full of them.

In any case today we are not here to talk about what I don’t like but rather what I do like. In today’s article we are going to look at several OSR games, what makes them great and why you should be playing them! Hope you enjoy the article, release the cracken!

Old School Essentials: Classic Fantasy

Old School Essentials is effectively the 1st edition B/X rules cleaned up with a few extras. Its sort of like taking a famous painting and restoring it, its as simple as that.

I put this here first and I will be brief, mainly because all that Old School Essentials is, is 1st edition B/X rules largely unchanged. This is B/X 1st edition, but organized as a rules reference to perfection. If you run B/X D&D, the Rules Tome for OSE is all you will ever need and its definitely far superior to the original printings. Everything is indexed, categorized and laid out with a single extremely well defined purpose, playability.

Now Necrotic Games also put out The Advanced Genre Rules book and this supplement is amazing, it compiles a lot of classic early edition races and classes, adds some rules for integrating race and class, instead of the traditional just class structure. They work together so you no longer have to make a decision one way or the other, you can pretty much let your players choose, they are balanced to work in the same game. Great addition.

Now as far as how good of a game is B/X 1st edition, well that is an article in its own right but the short and sweet of it is that as far as I’m concerned this is THE BEST version of the D&D and I say that without reservation. To me, B/X and BECMI rules are D&D, accept no substitute!

Dungeon Crawl Classics

Dungeon Crawl Classics has some of the most creative and BAP (Beer and Pretzel) adventures I have ever seen put to paper, Sailors on the Starless Sea is a classic in every sense of the word living up to the Dungeon Crawl Classics name.

Dungeon Crawl Classics is a kind of combination of old school lethality, mixed in with the simplicity of the basic 3rd edition rules strip down to its birthday suit and with a layer of Gonzo style magic systems that give Rollmaster tables a run for its money. The game also uses some wacky dice to give it some unique flavor though this is largely just a gimmicky thing for funzzies.

Dungeon Crawl Classics falls into the beer and pretzel RPG category for me. The game starts out with players making 4 0 level characters each (yes a typical game starts with 15-20 characters). These nobodies get basic NPC like classes from the peasant side of the fantasy universe like candle makers, cooks, farmers etc… and these would be heroes are thrust into an adventure called a funnel where they must effectively try to get to the bottom of the adventures evil plot while being armed with pitchforks and candle sticks.

With little chance of surviving at all, players must use narrative cleverness to get through it and though most characters are likely to die horrifically tragic deaths, those that do survive the funnel become full blown first level heroes getting a choice from all of the classic D&D fantasy classes.

The funnel to me is just an absolutely fantastic concept, it effectively allows players to write their origin stories and though its clearly meant as a kind of silly one shot adventure, the system is actually quite robust once you get into hero level characters and you can turn this into a full blow fantasy adventure game.

Certainly the Gonzo style writing of the official modules, which are absolutely brilliant, does suggest that the game is meant to be taken with a great deal of humor and because the deadliness of the game remains relatively steady throughout, there is a level of old school anxiety and fear built into the game that makes this an undeniable OSR game.

Really unique concept with a great, easy to learn mechanic but one with a bit of robustness and flavor that keeps itself interesting. Great fun addition to the OSR line up of amazing games.

Forbidden Lands

A game designed from the ground up for a sandbox campaign in what can only be described as the first truly unique campaign setting I have seen in a while that breaks the typical D&D fantasy world mold.

This OSR game keeps with the spirit of the classic D&D game, but has a couple of unique twists that really separate it from the field.

It leans more towards the survivor story, where characters exist in a desolate almost post apocalyptic fantasy world where the frontier is a complete unknown. They must explore it in hopes of finding their fortune in the classic D&D tradition, but the game puts a lot of weight on the concept of survival. Food and water are scarce, supplies and weapons are not easy to come by, their are almost not towns to shop at and the result is a game where you not only need to survive the adventure, but you need to survive the elements, starvation, dehydration and the general absence of the necessities of life.

This is also a sandbox hex crawl and as players explore the frontier the DM rolls to determine what they find in the various areas which leads the players to player driven goals which I think is the key feature of the game. There aren’t large narrative stories here, the players are meant to go out into the world and make something of themselves and what that ends up being is largely driven by the opportunities the frontier presents to them.

On a high level this is a sandbox game and it can very much be run as a western marshes style campaign where you can have a large group of friends who call upon your GM services whenever they like to contribute to an ongoing story about this frontier. Much of the game is randomly generated, what happens, what the story of the game is, is going to be as much a surprise to the GM as it is to the players. Yet there is a lot of content here that will inspire GM’s that love to write and you can definitely find yourself unintentionally world building. It’s almost as if its a game designed to not only produce an adventure for your players, but a new campaign setting for you as the GM.

While there are some hiccups in the system that will require a bit of GM intervention, they are minor and easily fixed. In my book this is another great entry into the OSR must play list.

Five Torches Deep

This is old school done with new school rules which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the OSR isn’t just about old Gronards playing their coveted 1st edition D&D.

Five Torches Deep is a very clever attempt to bring 5th edition D&D fans into the OSR fold and it does it with style, proving that not only is classic D&D not about classic rules, but somewhere buried beneath the nonsense of 5th edition D&D rules is actually a salvageable system.

Five Torches Deep is a game that is clearly inspired by the Dungeon Crawls of old and systems like B/X with those old school sentimentality. The goal of the game, much as it was it the golden age of D&D is to go into dungeons, fight monsters and steal their stuff!

This game however is dangerous as hell and leans heavily on player centricity with a pretty heavy handed dose of narrative flexibility. There is not much to the mechanic, its very much driven by the player-gm conversation style of role-playing, what I like to call… normal role-playing.

It uses a clever durability system and time tracking system to give the game an earthy, realistic tone reminiscent of B/X rules, while simultaneously it is very much a fantasy adventure where players are going to be kicking ass and taking names.

I don’t want to necessarily quantify this one as a beer and pretzel game, but I think its a bit too deadly and a bit to linear in its approach to stretch into the more serious campaign, though the rules are so flexible and modular here that you can easily pull from other sources to make it a bit more robust. In fact I think you can very easily inject B/X classes into this game with minimal effort or expand by creating your own. The classes available act almost as design templates to show you how its done. I think most players however will find the game a bit too limited as written and much like B/X rules that is fun for the first few levels, it needs more after a while much the same way B/X does. Eventually you will want more classes, more options and a bit wider range.

Still its just so well made, straight to the point, easy to get to the table. This is one of those games where you can bring friends over like its board game night, pull it out, make characters and be playing D&D in no time flat and that in my book is a game worth having on the shelf.

Blades In The Dark

Blades in the Dark shows of the versatility of the OSR and how the OSR can act as inspiration for design, rather then an example of it. Rather then being a retro clone of something that already exists, Blades in the Dark breaks new ground in game design.

I fell in love with Blades In The Dark after just three pages of reading and though I’m yet to run it, from the stand point of a GM who needs inspiration, this game, this setting and really just the entire concept is a fucking revelation. This book gives you the feeling you might remember when you got your first D&D book, that first read through, that first day of deciding you are going to play, the excitement of not knowing what’s going to happen. This book has that kind of magic.

This is a game that is narratively focused on a very specific concept. You and your friends take on the roles of effectively criminals in a early-industrial fantasy world, with only one goal. Pull off “Jobs”, aka, commit crimes in the city and try to get away with it. From heists, to burglaries and everything in-between this is the oceans eleven of fantasy RPG’s.

The system itself is superbly designed with every conceivable issue running a game in this style might present perfectly laid out for you with simple and applicable rules that make sense the first time you read them. This book is so well written, the concept so well thought out that I can see how this game practically runs itself.

More than that though the concept is just so amazing, who hasn’t thought of running a D&D game where everyone plays a thief and you indulge in your criminal fantasies. Clearly John Harper has.

There are plenty of variations on the thief class for everyone to find something to play, the setting itself is just the perfectly executed dark fantasy and their are turns and twists ready made for you to throw into your game that there is absolutely no way your players are going to expect.

Without a doubt one of the best RPG’s I have read in the last decade, this is the new gold standard to beat for OSR games.

Stars Without Numbers

Not since TSR’s take on sci-fi, Alternity have I found an RPG that does science-fiction with the respect and a sense of completeness. Stars Without Number is to me the modern take on running science-fiction, while clearly being a throwback to running the game in the classic OSR style.

Stars without numbers proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the OSR is alive and well and its not just about fantasy. Inspired by classic B/X rules and the classic RPG Trinity, Stars Without Numbers is a science-fiction sandbox for players to explore, yet the universe/setting is not some pre-generated science-fiction writing. This is a dynamically created world where even the GM doesn’t know what is going to be in his game until it starts. In a sense, much like Forbidden Stars, the result of playing this game is going to be dynamic world building.

This is a game that will put your improv skills to the test as a GM and though the system itself is simple, running this game I think is really the ultimate challenge for a DM. This game has every conceivable science-fiction trope that has ever existed in what I can only describe as a setting with infinite possibilities. Though its clearly inspired by Trinity, I can help but get an Alternity vibe from it, which notably is one of my all time favorite science-fiction RPG’s.

Really well written, easy to get into, its just the most perfect system for a science-fiction GM looking to create that perfect sci-fi game for his players.

Love this one, a must buy for any serious sci-fi fan.

Conclusion

It goes without saying that the OSR produces a lot of games, to create an article that covers all the good ones would take pages upon pages. I honestly could do this for days, but an article needs to end sometime.

The games I’ve chosen here are games I have either ran, played in or read, but there are many more I’m certain deserve to be on this list.

The important part here however is to present the OSR for what it is, a diverse sea of interesting games that make great alternatives to the tried and true, but sometimes rather stale accepted alternatives like Dungeons and Dragons, Pathfinder, Starfinder and the like.

These are some great games and I think as an RPG fan it’s everyone’s duty to explore games, to dig deeper and approach the entire hobby with an open mind. I find contemporary gamers who often claim inclusivity and tolerance in an attempt to appear politically modern are secretly some of the most judgmental and ruthlessly closed minded gamers out there refusing to touch anything without a Wizards of the Coast logo and casting a wide net of judgement against anything with the OSR label. Get out there and explore these amazing games, its nothing short of a tragedy to miss out on these experiences.

Gaming Articles, PC Game Reviews

MTG: Arena Reviewed

Magic The Gathering is the granddaddy of the collectable card game hobby, not only was it and continues to be one of the worlds largest competitive CCG’s with a player base of 35 million, but it was also the pioneer for the digital CCG scene launching Magic The Gathering Online back in 2002 notably even before games like World of Warcraft were launched that would decades later produce modern digital adaptations of CCG’s like Heartstone.

In short, it is the original, it is the one and what we are here to answer is whether or not this old dog is still worth your time, specifically in the digital age via the current adaptations of digital Magic the gathering known as MTG: Arena.

I think I have to be honest here before I begin that I played Magic: The Gathering religiously and competitively (The table top version) from 1993 with the release of the Arabian Nights until about 2006 just after the release of Coldsnap. After that I quit the game largely because I moved away from California to Sweden where I really didn’t find a MTG scene. Suffices to say I’m an old dog, I know this game like I know my own face.

Arabian Nights was the first set I collected and played way back in the early 90’s. Magic: The Gathering has come a long way since then when it comes to art and game balance, but the actual rules of the game have not changed in nearly 30 years.

This also means that my return to magic is done so very casually and to a degree cautiously. I have no intention of collecting physical cards and I’m not interested in spending large quantities of cash or even really competing online or otherwise. MTG: Arena is free to play and so my commitment level to this project was about as non-existent as it could be, MTG: Arena would have to sell itself to me because the game itself, Magic: The Gathering, I already know everything there is to know about it. I was expecting no surprises and really, to a larger degree for this to be a very short lived foray into the nostalgic memories of the game, nothing more.

I also questioned here whether or not MTG: Arena was a cash grab, or if they found a fun way to play and enjoy Magic: The Gathering in digital form. Given that Wizards of the Coast are the kings of cash grabs, I had very little confidence that it was going to surprise me in this regard. The short answer, really to my amazement, was that they broke expectation in a pretty significant way. Yes… not only is it super fun, it’s actually wildly better then the real thing. Structured and organized in an exceptional way that makes Magic: The Gathering fun again.

Before MTG: Arena, there was Magic: The Gathering Online. While MTG: Online is still available today, I can’t think of a single reason why you would play it over MTG: Arena, Arena is just better in every sense of the word and notably it’s free while MTG: Online will require you to shell out some cash to play.

I think it’s important to say that I believe what makes Magic: The Gathering a great game, as opposed to a terrible game is the format you play. Magic as a casual game to collect and play at home with friends with constructed decks in a non-format standard way is actually a really shit game, mechanically speaking. Essentially its a pay to win game and only in a very tempered group that sticks to formats and limiting budget does the game become reasonably fun. I believe this remains true of Magic: The Gathering today, whether you play the table top version or the online version.

To me the best Magic: The Gathering experience you will ever have is in draft play. Draft play is a format in which players open fresh booster packs, draft cards in a group and compete with the decks they construct from that draft. Their are various versions of draft play, including sealed draft for example but In these drafting formats, Magic: The Gathering’s playing field equalizes. The game goes from being about trying to collect all the strongest power cards (rares) and building highly optimized super decks and becomes a game of skill in drafting, constructing and using the cards.

The Quick Draft format is great because it simultaneously provides you a chance to collect cards want and levels the playing field when facing opponents that have access to a massive collection. Make no mistake, in a standard 60 card pre-constructed deck format players with lesser collections are at a massive disadvantage. Draft tournaments fix this problem.

It’s also at its best in a competitive environment because unique opponents bring unique experiences. When you play the same people, with the same collections, using the same style and decks, the game wares out its welcome very quickly.

In short, to keep Magic: The Gathering fresh you have to play it competitively, in draft formats and playing within a single set or at least within the current standard (the last 3 sets + the core set for the year)

In comes MTG: Arena. MTG: Arena does a really great job of not only making itself accessible by having a really great tutorial sequence and giving you a great starting collection for free, but it has an amazing setup for earning rewards and giving you reason to explore every inch of the games different formats and styles of play including most notably competitive play.

Now you have your standard mode, build a 60 card deck from your collection and play a casual game against an opponent. In so doing, you earn various rewards ranging from new cards, decks and cosmetic trinkets. In addition you earn the in game currency (gold) which can be used in various methods to get more booster packs to expand your collection. You could effectively play this way indefinitely, earning rewards, expanding your collection and playing “standard Magic: The Gathering”. Like your home games however there are going to be a lot of flaws in this format and I do believe it would get boring very quickly.

Fortunately this is not however what MTG: Arena wants you to do and likely for that very reason and so it puts carrots out there for you to get involved in the higher echelons of the games competitive scene and it does this in a number of really clever ways.

First their is ranked play, which is essentially exactly as the standard non-ranked play except that it tracks your progress in a ranking system made up of various tiers ranging from Bronze all the way to Mythic, with many levels in-between. A casual gamer might see this as intimidating but here is the thing. It’s worth it! You get more rewards from playing in ranked play then you do in non-ranked play and there is no drawback to it.

Essentially the only difference is that as you advance in the ranks, you, in addition to the standard rewards also unlock ranking rewards. Even just playing 1 ranked game win or lose will earn you a booster pack and you can earn both gold, booster packs and cosmetic stuff by participating through success. There is quite literarily no logical reason whatsoever not to always be playing ranked and strictly speaking you are far more likely to meet opponents of your skill level in ranked play, then playing in non-ranked play where you are just matched up with whoever is available as opposed to someone in your current rank.

As you rise in the ranks of ranked play you earn rewards. While reaching high ranks like Diamond and Mythic is going to be a real challenge, reaching gold rank is a reasonable goal for every MTG: Arena.

More importantly is that it’s a ladder and gets you into the competitive spirit where you try to improve your decks, find ones that work well and compete for your status in the MTG community. This becomes a vary natural addictive element and really helps to solidify your first steps into a larger world.

Over time you will earn gold in addition to other rewards and this is where MTG: Arena helps you to take the next baby step to induct even the most casual of players into competitive play. They do this by making the rewards for playing in events better then simply using the gold to buy stuff in the shop and it is not based on winning anything in these events.

Essentially if you take 5,000 gold you will be able to buy 5 booster packs in the shop. However if you instead take that 5,000 gold and join a Quick Draft Tournament, you will earn 4 packs and 50 gems even if you lose every single one of your three games. But by simply playing in the tournament you automatically gain the Bronze tier in limited play, which earns you another pack. Its just economically a better way to spend your gold even if you just do it once.

Here is the kicker though, you get to do a draft tournament and if you actually win a couple of games, a very likely scenario even for the most novice of players, you will earn even more rewards. Winning just 3 matches will earn you 300 gems. Gems are the other currency in the game, for which people pay actual money. 300 gems is roughly worth 2 bucks. You can use the gems to buy more packs or other rewards from the shop, or you can just go right back around and put it towards your next tournament entry.

Furthermore you get to draft pick the cards from the boosters and after the tournament add them to your collection. So even if you suck at the game and lose every match, rather then opening a random booster and getting what you get, you can hand pick the cards you want. This may not seem immediately apparent but is actually a far more efficient way to collect cards.

Its really a win win situation and the end result I can only assume is that everyone is using their gold to enter into tournaments, in a way this economic system turns everyone on MTG: Arena into a competitive player.

Just these two key carrots, ranked play and tournament play, because they made them attractive through rewards makes MTG: Arena an amazing implementation of Magic The Gathering as a system. It’s really a kind of economic eco system that will have you exploring everything the digital version of Magic: The Gathering has to offer, eventually you will find formats and a routine that works for you and as your game improves you will find yourself not only competing regularly but doing far better then you thought was possible.

A typical Quick Draft even has you earning an extra pack and some gems even with an 0-3 record, which means that using your gold which you will earn through play is guaranteed. There is absolutely no good reason not to play in these tournaments since you are very likely to put at least a couple of wins on the board. The rewards grow quickly, if you can hit that 3-5 wins in a draft you make out like a bandit.

As I spent more and more time chasing victories, building decks and massaging my collection I came to the stark realization. The game is actually a lot of fun too.

The digital implementation of Magic The Gathering in MTG: Arena is smooth, responsive, the interface clear, easy to manage and the general balance at least of the current standard is extraordinarily well done. Wizards of the Coast has clearly learned a great deal over the years of running the game, it has developed into a far better game then I remember it being.

MTG: Arena is not without its faults however but I honestly can’t complain too much. Like many modern digital ladder games, their is an XP/Leveling system with rewards, from which you get a lot more if you shell out the money for a premium account. You get rewards for leveling up on a free account as well, but obviously the premium account showers you with them enticing you to buy into the 20 dollar cover charge for the privilege. The thing is that you actually spend 3400 gems to do this, which means that if your successful in tournaments using your in game earned gold, you could very easily pay for a premium accounts from your winnings. In fact this is not that hard to do, every couple of days you will earn enough gold to participate in a tournament. You will likely play at least a dozen tournaments if you invest your gold. If you consistently get 2-5 victories in each of these tournaments you will earn far more gems then you need to pay for a premium account. In fact, a single 7 out of 7 victory will do that.

One thing worth noting as well is that there is no tutorial for drafting, so the first few times you do this its likely going to feel very alien to you and drafting is a skill that takes time to develop. Doing it poorly results in you having a really tough time winning even a single match and drafting is not a skill you will be able to practice often because its only available when you actually participate in a drafting event, which of course costs gold or gems to enter. Drafting is not hard to learn to do moderately well, but it will cost you precious gold or gems to practice.

Secondly there is no way to trade cards The lack of card trading in a collectable trading card game is a really strange decision to an old school MTG player like me. The replacement for this function is a wild card system. Essentially periodically you will get wild cards for different rarities when opening packs. These you can use to craft any card of the same rarity. Its worth noting as well that you can’t have more then 4 copies of any card, so anytime you would get a 5th card you get credits towards your “vault” which earns you wild cards. Its an ok replacement for card trading, but this leads MTG: Arena into a separate issue of online community isolation (more on that later).

This is functional enough, but when your trying to put together a specific deck and you don’t have enough wild cards your kind of left hanging. Since collecting cards, trading them and building decks is a really big part of a CCG experience, its absence in MTG Arena is sorely missed.

Finally and I have to admit that this is a mixed blessing, their is virtually no interaction between you and your opponent above and beyond playing a match. In fact there is no interaction with any part of the community in game. There are no chat channels of any kind in the game, no trading, really no reason or way for people to communicate through the platform (aka community isolation). Now from my personal experience with the previous digital rendition of Magic The Gathering (MTG Online) I can say that the MTG community leaves a lot to be desired, like most online communities. So having them be effectively silenced allowing you to focus on the game rather then watching profanities scroll by may have in fact been the right call by Wizards of the Coast who notably doesn’t have a public forum either for any of their games. Likely hard lessons learned about the generally poor behavior of online communities.

You do have emotes where you can congratulate an opponent on a win and other such one liners, but generally even though the game is called MTG: Arena and it is an online game with real life opponents, as you play you barely even make that connection. They may as well be bot AI’s.

On the positive note when it comes to tournaments in particular you can just focus on the game and because the various event based tournaments are not precisely linked by specific players, you can participate in these events at whatever pace you like. You can join a draft, spend as long as you like building your deck and then play as many or as few matches as you like, whenever you have time. There is no pressure to “hurry up and finish” the tournament or waiting around. The pacing of the arena is very steady and at your leisure. The only obligation you really have to the online universe here is to finish the current match you’re in.

Conclusion

I have to admit I really didn’t think I would enjoy or continue to play, let alone get back into the competitive scene of Magic The Gathering when I started with MTG Arena. I was really surprised how easy and rewarding the experience has been and though I suppose I do miss some of the human interaction, overall I would say the experience has been very positive.

At its core MTG: Arena is the full Magic: The Gathering experience in digital form with all of the competitive and casual formats you would expect to see. There are always new releases coming, new challenges and interesting special events that makes logging in every day and running some games fun and worth doing and has just become the new norm for me.

Another major benefit of playing MTG: Arena is that the game handles all of the rules for you and resolves all the various effects that transpire in a logical, very clear way. This means a game that might typically take 45 minutes will take you 10 minutes instead. It cannot be overstated how much easier digital magic is versus the table top version.

I absolutely love the fact that you are always rewarded in some way for your matches, that your encouraged to compete in events and that you can do all of it at your own pace, in your own time. It’s really quite perfect especially since you can go from launching the game to being in a competitive match and back out to deal with laundry inside of 10-15 minutes. Its so convenient, smooth and easy, for anyone who has a love for the game, this platform is in just about every way I can think of quite perfect for your typical MTG fan.

Now of course it is still Magic: The Gathering and the rules for the game have not changed in 30 years. Many of the mechanical warts of the game are still there and compared to modern CCG’s, MTG certainly shows its age. You can and will get mana fucked with reasonable regularity, there are insane combos that once executed you can’t do shit about, there are trick decks that will annoy you and if you are in a rush to get your collection up, you can as always spend your rent money in short order. The game can sometimes be a bit frustrating.

MTG: Arena is certainly not enough to get me back into the physical game, in fact, it had quite the opposite effect. If I want to play Magic: The Gathering with friends, in particular in these Covid-19 days, playing the game on MTG: Arena is far superior to the real thing. I would much rather play this then spend time fucking about with Magic: The Gathering Cards.

If you have never played Magic: The Gathering and have always wanted to try it, this platform is perfect. If you already love Magic: The Gathering and want to play more, this is the perfect platform. If you already don’t like the physical form of the game, playing it online is not going to change your mind. This is the same old Magic: The Gathering it has always been. It’s a bit leaner, a bit smoother and much more accessible in MTG: Arena, but still Magic: The Gathering the classic collectable game for better or worse.

Best of List

Top 10 Board Games 2020 Edition

It has been almost a full year and a half since I have updated this list and while board gaming as a hobby has been tragically hindered by the ongoing covid crisis pretty much the entire year, I think an update is in order.

This time around there are some pretty heavy handed changes and I have to admit that even I was surprised when I was finished writing this article and making my determination, but on the bright side there is plenty of new stuff to talk about so without further delay, lets get into it.

10. B-17 Flying Fortress Leader

I know that solo games are not everyone’s cup of tea but this game has so much great depth and such an amazing feel factor, not to mention it looks absolutely stunning on the table that it just has to be on my list.


I will be the first to admit that when it comes to my top 10 list, putting this one on here I have almost a sense of embarrassment. It’s sort of like admitting that you like the Star Wars Holiday special, or are a fan of white socks with sandals.

While it’s not my first solo game on the list, this is a rather obscure DVG game that I think most people who look at my list will scratch their head and wonder where the connection is, how in the world you go from any of these game to this one. It’s just something out of left field.

The truth is however that B-17 Flying Fortress Leader is one of those “piece of engineering” games that has this very tight, story driven premise that I personally find completely engrossing. You are a commander of a fleet of American bombers during World War II, making all of the decisions about bombing targets, flight paths, plane configurations, resource management and general command decisions. You setup all of your orders and put everything into place and then the games AI takes over where your plan is executed and you watch helplessly as your decisions are put into action. Its just enthralling and though I can’t say I’m a huge history buff, there is something about this particular piece of history I just can’t help but obsess over. There is just something sexy about world war II American bomber planes.

More than that though this is a game that just looks amazing on your hobby table, it’s an intimate solo game that you can play in one sitting or spread it out over days. It has a really fine-tuned sequence and there is a tremendous amount of strategy and planning that when done well you are rewarded for, yet there are surprising twists that keep you coming back to try again and again.

It’s a hard one to recommend to a general player base but It would be dishonest if I didn’t put it on my personal top ten list given how often I play it. If you have an interest in the subject matter and are looking for a cool solo game however, if my opinion counts, I think this is one of the coolest games I have found in years. (read the full review here ).

9. Twilight Struggle

Twilight Struggle really blew me away the first time I played it despite having a lot of reservations about even trying it. It’s one of those games you always hear about but don’t actually think you will like, well I’m here to tell you, you are wrong. You will like this game, any reasonable gamer will.

Twilight Struggle is an award winning game that has maintained a strong presence in the euro gaming community on board game geek for years, keeping the number one spot for nearly a decade. It has a digital app, yearly competitions and is considered widely as one of the best designs in board gaming by some of the most prestigious designers around.

That is not however why I like it, quite to the contrary, I was fairly uninterested in the game despite all of these accolades and have only recently tried it on a whim with very few expectations. Truth is that the subject matter didn’t interest me and I feel very strongly that theme is key to any game that would ordinarily make this list.

Twilight Struggle’s surprise for me was two fold. First I was shocked to discover how amazing the game actually was and how well deserved its praises really were. This is a deep, thinky and very dynamic game that pulls on a lot of mechanical levers that beg to be explored. More importantly however it actually inspired an interest in the subject matter for me (The Cold War) which is actually a fascinating period in history full of intrigue, actions and counter actions that give A Song of Ice and Fire a run for its money.

Just a fantastic game, one of my favorite discoveries in the last few years and as you have already been told by pretty much everyone, this is a game that belongs on your shelf no matter what type of board gamer you are.

8. War of The Ring

The Asymmetrical 2 player epic is effectively Lord of the Rings in a box, if you love the books and movie, this is an amazing way the battle for Middle-Earth.

This year I have tried to be honest with myself and include “times played” as a consideration for judgement for games on this list. Truth be told, I have not played War of the Ring for nearly 3 years at this point and this is the reason it drops to the number 8 spot. I couldn’t bring myself to remove it from the list entirely because I still consider it to be one of the best 2 player epics out there, but fall it has and unless something changes, fall off the list it will.

I have spoken so much about this game over the years I could put up half a dozen links from this sight alone, it feels strange to repeat any of it. I think the game can be summed up by saying that this is the entire Lord of the Rings story in a box, if you love the middle earth saga you must play this game. This game is Lord of the Rings.

So why haven’t I played it, this I think is a fair question that should be answered. After all its on my top 10 list and I haven’t played it in 3 years, that needs an explanation. The answer however is actually quite simple. When the opportunity to play 2 player games comes up, this is usually time reserved for playing miniature games. Miniature games in my gaming group carry a lot of weight and so there is this default assumption that if there is 2, then we play a miniature game. It’s just really hard for me to get 2 player board games to the table in general no matter how good I think they are.

7. Game of Thrones The Board Game 2nd Edition

This is a game that is played in the minds of the players, the board and pieces are mostly distraction.

Game of Thrones the board game has had a consistent presence on this list for years but this year it takes a significant drop from the number 3 spot. I don’t think this is a reflection on the game itself but popularity and current plays of any game are going to fluctuate and frankly this year Game of Thrones was a bit meh all together in our group and especially for me.

I think its something that happens eventually when you have played a game often enough where you start to see some of the chinks in the armor. Don’t get me wrong, this game would not be on this list if I didn’t love it and was willing to drop what I’m doing to play it, but I certainly can think of several epics I would pick right now over this one to play in a larger 5-6 player group. It is a great game, it has been a great game for over a decade in my group, but I’m at a point with it where I have played it enough times that it may be time to retire it from this list.

For those that have never played this one however, know that its staying power in my gaming group and for me personally exceeds a decade of entertainment, if you can get that much out of any game its what I would call an auto-buy. Like that is a great record to have for a game and GoT the board games earns those stripes undisputed.

6. War Room

War Room is not a game, it’s an experience. It takes the idea of playing war games to the absolute limit, yet somehow makes it very accessible and to some degree practical. You’re going to need a huge table and a lot of time, but that is the price of entry into this theatre of the mind.

I was very hesitant about putting this game on this list because I have to be honest here, I am yet to play a full game with a full group. Its on this list largely because I know my games, I know what I like and I know that a game is “going to be amazing” from reading of rules and play testing it myself. I have done this extensively with War Room and I’m almost 100% certain that after playing it with my local gaming group this one will surge on this list to one of the top spots. For now I leave it at number 7 for the sake of propriety.

War Room is Larry Harris’s new world war II epic, the guy that brought us the ultimate classic Axis and Allies. War Room is massive both in size and scope, a game designed with about the most elegant and well thought out mechanics I have seen in years. Its very clear that Larry took his time with this one using all of the experience, feedback and knowledge he has mustard up over the last few decades with Axis and Allies.

It is absolutely astonishingly beautiful on the table, its designed with various player counts in mind and though like Axis and Allies and most “super games” as I like to call them this one is long as fuck and will not be easy to get to the table, likely taking in excess of 12 hours. Hence this is an event in a box and it makes no apologies for that.

This game will make you feel like a military commander running world war II and this is exactly what the game tries to accomplish. The rules are relatively simple but the strategies go deep and its going to cease up your brain as you try to unravel the possibilities. For fans of war games, in particular Axis and Allies, this is a must own. Unfortunately its a very exclusive and hard to get game not to mention without a doubt one of the most expensive I have ever bought so be warned before you get too excited that this one may be as hard to get on your shelf as it is to get to the table.

5. Twilight Imperium 4th edition

Without a doubt one of my favorite games of all time, Twilight Imperium is just part of the family at this point.

Twilight Imperium is a game I have talked about since I started this blog and the blog before that. In fact, I have spent the last 10+ years talking about it and frankly I’m yet to fully tire of it. This is a versatile game that offers science-fiction fans the ultimate epic in gaming today. There is no game on the market that comes even close to creating such a dynamic, one of a kind experiences as Twilight Imperium and though it has fluctuated on this list over the years and editions, this latest version of the game is in my humble opinion the best yet and by a wide margin.

I think of all the things I could say about Twilight Imperium the one that should get your attention is that despite its weight, scope and play time, it is a relatively simple game to learn to play and learn to play well. A couple of games of this and anyone can become an expert and that is what I love about it. The mechanics just work and just like all great board games, much of the games strategy and game play is very much player driven. Which simply means that every group is going to play this game differently and each time you add or exchange a player the dynamics of the game will change.

Love it, always have, always will.

4. Vampire: The Masquerade Heritage

Vampire Heritage is the new kid on the block, fresh and young and though legacy games have a tendency to rise and fall, I think this one may stick around a lot longer than what might be expected. Very strong opening.

Anyone who follows my blog may know that I’m a huge Vampire: The Masquerade RPG fan, in fact I have been running a Vampire Chronicle with my local group going on 3 years now and we absolutely love everything about this setting. When a board game set in the world of darkness was announced it was an easy decision for us, but frankly we were quite reserved in our excitement initially. Vampire as a game and as a setting is a very delicate matter to fans like us and its easy to fuck up, our confidence that someone would come along and make a great board game out of it was lets just say limited.

Boy where we wrong, holy shit balls this game is amazing. Now I have put it on my number 6 spot only because we have just started to play this legacy game, having only finished our first era of the game, but I personally fell instantly in love with this one for three key, indisputable reason.

First is that the game captures the world of vampires with perfection. This is exactly the feeling I was hoping the game would offer. The politics, the betrayals, the maneuvering, the manipulation.. its all there. It gives you that creepy sense of place and time, illustrated beautifully to also enhance the imagery. Really just a perfect execution of the theme in board game form.

The second thing is that the game is extremely simple from a mechanical “how do you play this thing” point of you, while the gameplay, the strategy itself is immensely complicated. I love it when any game does this, where I can sit down with friends and spend 10 minutes explaining “how” the rules work, but we will spend the next six months trying to figure out how to win. Again I can’t say enough how pleased I was to see this approach taken, its really amazing.

Finally its a legacy game and I know a lot of people have reservations about legacy games because they are sort of “one shot” play throughs but there are 21 games in the chronicle and even after 3 games (the first era) the game has fundamentally changed in unique ways that will not repeat if you in the future would replay this one. Those permanent alterations to the game give this amazing sense of personalization and when you really think about it one of the biggest problems with most board games is that you will eventually tire of playing them anyway. The legacy keeps the game fresh play after play which means that each time we get together though we are playing the same game, things will be very different. I love this concept, I think it works particularly well in this game.

For fans of the world of darkness, don’t hesitate, this is a game tailor made for you.

3. Lord of the Rings The Living Card Game

I love this game and true love lasts forever!

Yes, my favorite, top game of all time has dropped down from the list. What can I tell you, it happens to the best of them. I have to say however even though this card game represents the highest investment I have ever made in a game (I have an almost complete collection), I have gotten more joy out of this game then everything else in my collection combined and I know I will play it forever.

Its just an amazing game and you can read the various reviews and comments on this one all over this blog site, I speak of it often. The truth is however that I have played this game so much that its time for me to sort of move on to other things.. for a while. I will certainly be back at some point as this one has a tendency to resurge like crazy. I have periods when I play this one non-stop and periods when I don’t play at all, but it goes back and forth.

What is it, why do I love it, just read the review and you will understand. REVIEW.

2. Through The Age: A New Story of Civilizations

Through The Ages is to Civilization building games what Twilight Imperium is to science-fiction games. Its a game fit for a king.

Through The Ages drops to the number 2 spot on my list, but holds strong as one of my all time favorites. This has always been one of those games that’s tough to recommend much like Twilight Imperium and maybe even War Room simply because of the length of play. Through The Ages however has two things going for it that keeps it on my radar far more frequently then the other “heavy” board game experiences.

For one, it plays really well with a small group, even as a two player game. Far more importantly however is that its supported by a really great app allowing me to play it whenever I have time without the fuss of trying to get a table game going and nothing is lost in this resource management game when doing so. I certainly think the pandemic crisis in the world leaving me locked in my house has helped this game to claim more of my free gaming time then it might have otherwise, but I have played this game quite consistantly for over 3 years now and I still love it every bit as much as I always have.

Recently it got an expansion as well which is the first for the Through The Age franchise as the original version never got that service which has also helped to refresh the game for me.

Love this one, but it’s heavy, thinky and long so be ready for that if you plan to commit.

1. A Song of Ice and Fire: The Miniature Game

Song of Ice and Fire is one of those games that you just know 20 years from now you will look back and consider it a classic, a game that becomes representative of an age of gaming in your life. It’s just that good.

Without question or doubt, Song of Ice and Fire the miniature game is the big blow out in 2020 for me. A game I have played and obsessed over at every opportunity I could get and thanks to the ability to play the game online through the use of Table Top Simulator, I played it a lot this year.

It’s not the first miniature game to find its way to the top spot on my list, you may recall (if you read my blog) that Star Wars: X-Wing held that spot tightly for a couple of years.

Song of Ice and Fire is just one of those gems that fires on all cylinders both as a miniature game and just as a gaming experience for me. It’s deeply tactical, yet simple to learn, it adds the hobby component but makes it as painless for you as possible, it has a really strong community and tremendous support by the publisher.

More than that though its just a fun game to play, it’s one of those “sink your teeth into it” kind of games that you can analyze and experiment with, the more you play the more you discover the little nook and crannies of possibilities. List building, adapting new ways to use the same units, trying to find those great positional and circumstantial moments that tip the scales. I love that it’s so dynamic as well, rather then your standard “lets just kill each other” it’s a mission based game and each mission is as unique as the next, all of them presenting interesting and diverse challenges.

The fact that its based on an amazing franchise with a robust theme, one it incorporates amazingly well certainly adds to the games flavor but certainly at least for me personally the fact that all my friends dove in head first into it means that I have a plethora of opponents always available representing all of the factions in the game.

It’s just a really solid miniature game that dropped into my group at the right time, one that I’m totally head over heels for, it earns its stripes as the top game for this list.

The Drop Offs

I always feel compelled to mention some of the games that drop off the list, in particular given that I still consider them amazing games worth your time.

Shogun by Queen Games falls off the top 10 list for the first time since I started the list and I can’t stress enough how painful that was as I absolutely adore this game. The dice tower of terrible faith, the deeply analytical planning phase and those explosive “I can’t believe that just happened” moments as battles are resolves are just a small taste of why I love this game. It’s wonderful but it gets pushed off the list, it happens to the best of them.

Great Western Trail is another one I consider “the best in genre”. This is probably my favorite pure euro, pure victory point smorgasbord game. It’s just clever as hell and deserves all of the praise it gets from the general gaming community. It was only ever at the tale end of my top 10 list, but certainly deserving to be on the list as is any other game that made it over the years.

New Angeles was one I didn’t really lose too much sleep over, don’t get me wrong I think it’s a great game but I felt it had sort of played itself out for me personally. It’s still a staple of my gaming groups yearly super board gaming weekend for good reason as its a fantastic group game and I’m sure that will remain unchanged, but for me it was time for it to go.

Blood Rage is one I struggle with always because I do believe it to be an absolutely perfectly designed game, but I just don’t play it often enough nor find myself drawn to it frequently enough to justify its presence on my list. That does not change its status as the only game on this blog that ever got a perfect 5 out of 5 star review rating, it deserved it and I stand by it.

Star Wars Armada falls of the list and I think its largely because I just don’t feel there is room on my top 10 list for two miniature games and A Song of Ice and Fire blew it out of the sky with ease. There will always be a special place in my heart for Armada as I do believe it to be a fantastic game, but its so heavy and weighs you down so much that I just can’t bring myself up to restarting the engines. I don’t have any intentions to get rid of my collection and I do genuinely hope it comes back around in my group some day, but right now I’m battling it over the seven kingdoms of Westeros and loving it.

Dedicated To All Things Gaming