Category Archives: What Makes It Tick

Gaming Articles, What Makes It Tick

Rules Lawyer – Warhammer 40k 10th edition: Understanding The Benefits of Cover

One of the most confusing rules in Warhammer 40k, 10th edition, is The Benefits of Cover rule, specifically how you resolve wounds and today we are going to tackle that problem. We are going to use logic, our understanding of the English language, and everything that has ever been said about it officially in the rules to try and get it right…. hopefully…. maybe…

Ok so disclosure time, strictly speaking, while I take a crack at it here from rules as written perspective, the truth is that I’m uncertain that this is the way the rules were intended to work. Intention and rules as written, don’t always align.

Ok… let’s get into it.

Here it is from the horse’s mouth, the rules for the Benefit of Cover.

Visibility and Cover

Ok first thing is first, we need to understand the language difference between the concept of Visibility and Cover.

Visibility is about ranged shooting for the most part, though other rules also use visibility in different ways. The rule is quite simple, if you can draw a line of sight from one unit to another unit, you have visibility. Now there are categories of visibility.

There is Model Visibility and there is Unit Visibility. It’s mostly a distinction without much of a difference to a shooting unit, if you can see any model in a unit, you have unit visibility. It’s that simple and I don’t think anyone has any confusion about that.

Here is the BIG catch. When shooting we talk about Unit Visibility to determine the target, which as already pointed out is what you have if you’re shooting a unit you can see any model or part of a model in a unit, at which point you have unit visibility aka, a target.

Cover does not ever use the word unit at any point. It always references the Model. This is important to establish in order to understand the rest of the logic and language of the benefit of cover rules. The concept of the unit has nothing to do with the benefits of cover, only models matter to the benefit of cover rules!

Gaining The Benefits of Cover

The when of it is pretty self-explanatory with one key caveat that I will repeat many times. You gain the benefits of cover for a MODEL by being obscured in different ways by terrain. Crates and Rubble, Barricades and Fuel Pipes, Battlefield Debris, and so on, all have their own rules for WHEN you gain the benefit of cover, but again, the rules are quite specific that benefits of cover are allocated to models, never units. This is the key to the execution of the rule.

Making Wound Saves and Benefits of Cover

Each time a ranged attack is allocated to a model that has the Benefit of Cover, add 1 to the saving throw made for that attack (excluding invulnerable saving throws). Models with a Save characteristic of 3+ or better cannot have the Benefit of Cover against attacks with an Armour Penetration characteristic of 0.

Pretty straightforward, but again, the key here is the model. So let’s talk about Allocating Attacks.

Ok so this happens before the opponent makes a wound save for a model in the targeted unit (an important distinction) they must CHOOSE at this point, which model will take the wound (s).

At this stage, you select which MODEL will be removed as a result of a failed wound save.

Now remember that while we often roll buckets of dice representing multiple shots and multiple attacks etc… when rolling for wounds, a distinction between models must be made. In the same way, you have units with leaders and characters who might have different statistics, you need to decipher who is taking which wounds and that may change what sort of dice results you need for success or failure.

Benefits of Cover fall into this same category and function under the same rules, its model specific. More important is the saving throw rules here, which again, are on a per-model basis are super clear.

Here you can see that the allocation was already completed, so we know which model will be affected by a wound and now the player rolls the save and if the save fails, that model is removed. You can’t pick other models, it’s not a choice, you must remove the model that was allocated for the attack.

Examples and Putting It All Together

let’s do a full example to illustrate how wounds are allocated, how we roll wounds, and how we divide them when some models in a unit have the benefits of cover and some don’t.

Image 1

In Image 1 Unit A has rolled 7 wounds on Unit B. In Unit B, three models have the benefit of cover and two models do not. How do you resolve the wounds in this situation?

To begin with, the defender gets to allocate the wounds. The defender can put the wounds all on the models that have the benefit of cover. However, since there is only 3 of them, you cannot just roll 7 dice (7 saves). The reason is that once three models have been killed, the rest of the models in the unit no longer have the benefit of cover.

So you would have to first roll 3 saves and see how many survive. Let’s imagine, 2 of them failed and 1 of them succeeded on the save. Two models must be removed and since the defender chose the models in cover to take the wounds, they MUST remove from those models first.

Why? Because the allocation and wound roll is done on a model basis, one model at a time and benefits of cover is also per model. We are taking a shortcut by rolling 3 wounds at a time because the models that have been allocated to take the wounds share the same statistic and have the benefit of cover. The player could not now, change their mind and remove a different set of models (those not gaining the benefit of cover). The player must remove those that do have the benefit of cover because that was the allocation.

This is the common mistake players make and get wrong with this rule. It’s the same as having a special character in a unit. You can’t have the special character with a better save take all the wounds, but then remove other models of the unit with worse saves as sacrificial lambs. A wound is allocated to a specific model in a unit, you roll the die for that model, and if that model fails its save, that model is removed.

Image 2

In image 2 we continue with resolving the same scenario. Originally there were 7 wounds, but 3 have been allocated and resolved, resulting in 2 models being removed from unit B, but we have 4 wounds left to resolve.

The player of Unit B again gets to do the allocation, so naturally, they choose the model in cover to get the benefit of a cover bonus to their save. This time, they must roll 1 die at a time, until either they make 4 saves, or they fail one. Let’s imagine that they save 2, but fail the 3rd roll. Again, now the model that was allocated to the wound must be removed.

Image 3

Finishing off the example, we have resolved 6 of the 7 wounds. We have one left to allocate and now we must allocate it to models in unit B that do not have the benefits of cover, as there are no more models left in unit B to which a wound could be allocated that have the benefit of cover. They will have a worse save.

Conclusion

Is this a good rule? I think it’s a bit finicky but honestly, I have no idea. What I’m certain about is that I have executed this example exactly how the rules instruct you to resolve the benefits of cover. It’s a bit slow, as you have to divide up and make separate rolls for models that have the benefit of cover vs. those that don’t, but it is what it is.

And yes there can be situations where you might have to roll a single die over and over again until you fail for example when 19 of the 20 models in a unit don’t have benefits of cover, but one does and you have 10 wounds to allocate. Naturally, you want to try to make as many of those rolls with the benefits of cover as you can, to leverage that quirky little advantage, but eventually… probably that model will die and then you can chuck the rest of the dice for models without the benefit of cover.

Very often cover doesn’t matter in the event you have units with a 2+ or +3 save, but if you want to play by the rules as written, I believe that this is it.

I hope that alleviates some confusion among players out there, it sure as shit, confused the hell out of me.

Best of List, Gaming Articles, On The Table, What Makes It Tick

Miniature Game Theory: Picking The Right Game For You

It happened by accident—at least, that’s what I tell myself—but the truth is, I own a lot of miniature games. I’ve painted and played so many that it’s a little scary! I don’t even want to think about how much time and money I’ve sunk into this hobby, especially not around my wife! In today’s article, I’ll take all that hard-earned experience and try to put it to good use by offering some advice on finding the perfect miniature game for you, with a few recommendations sprinkled in.

Let’s dive right in!

The Three Categories Of Miniature Gaming

Most miniature games can be sorted into three broad categories—though many games blur the lines between them. These categories are: hobby-focused games (sometimes called lore-heavy games), mechanics-focused games (often competitive in nature), and narratively focused games (driven by storytelling and immersion).

Now, every game publisher will tell you their game does everything, and technically, they’re not wrong—but the reality is, most games lean heavily into one category more than the others, often to an extreme. Knowing what kind of game you’re getting into and understanding how the community that plays that game sees it is a big part of the key to picking the right game for yourself.

Categorization is key because all miniature games are marketed in a visually exciting way because they ARE visually exciting. If you pick a game like Star Wars: Shatterpoint, you likely have certain expectations and imagery about what the experience might be like (player expectations), but Shatterpoint is a highly mechanized game designed for competitive play, about playing King of the Hill on generic objectives. It’s closer to being a board game than being a miniature game, falling heavily into the Mechanic-Focused category.

Let’s break down these categories for clarity.

Hobby-focused games

Hobby-focused games are all about the experience—stunning miniatures, immersive lore, and endless collection opportunities. Here, the gameplay often takes a backseat to the joy of building, painting, and diving deep into the game’s rich world.

These games are usually supported by expansive novels, army books, special terrain, and a constant stream of new releases. They demand a serious investment—not just in time, but in cold hard cash. Hobby-focused games are easily the most expensive, often costing two to four times more than other types.

A prime example? Warhammer 40k by Games Workshop. To even get started, you’ll need at least a 1,000-point army (2,000 points being standard), translating to anywhere from 50 to 100 models. Before you can even think about playing, you’re looking at hundreds—if not thousands—of dollars spent on miniatures, terrain, rulebooks, and accessories.

While most miniature games can be classified as a hobby to some degree as you will often be assembling and painting miniatures, there is a distinct difference between miniature games being a hobby and a game being hobby-focused. Warhammer: Underworld for example aims to get you playing the game right away with easy-to-assemble miniatures that have colored plastic with a game that is played on a hex board with all the accessories (cards, tokens etc..) included in the box. You can play a full game like Underworld a few hours after you open the box, it is not a hobby-focused game even though you will get the opportunity to paint some miniatures and experience the miniature gaming hobby element inherent in all miniature games.

When all is said and done, you’ll likely spend over $500 and 100+ hours before experiencing the full game of Warhammer 40k as it is intended to be played. No ad will tell you this, and hardcore fans might argue otherwise, but trust me—after 35+ years in the hobby, I’ve yet to meet anyone who’s done it for less.

Warhammer 40k is a hobby-focused game, you will spend just shy of 100 dollars to get into the starter set and after assembling and painting these miniatures you will discover that what you have purchased is not even close to the full game. You are still hundreds of dollars and hours away from experiencing Warhammer 40k from this point. In fact, the starter set doesn’t even teach you the real game, it gives you a sort of “sub-game” of the real thing. Warhammer 40k assumes a lot about what you will spend in terms of dollars and hours preparing to play a full game.

The trick is that this is exactly what Hobby-Focused games are designed to be and it’s what fans of such games want. If it was easy and fast, it would not have the same appeal. To hobby-focused gamers, this long road is seen as an opportunity, not a drawback.

But here’s the thing—fans of hobby games love this level of commitment. The journey of collecting and painting is the whole point. You’re never done, and that’s exactly the appeal. To fans of these hobby-focused games, the journey is the juice.

Mechanics-Focused Games

If hobby games are about immersion, mechanics-focused games are about playing—and playing now. These games prioritize tight, balanced rules over deep lore or hobby elements, often designed for competitive tournament play.

Many of these games require little to no hobby work at all. most come with pre-painted miniatures, easy-to-assemble miniatures and/or low model counts, making them much more accessible for casual or competitive players.

Examples? Star Wars: X-Wing and Star Wars: Armada, with streamlined mechanics and pre-painted minis that let you jump straight into the action. Even hybrid games like Star Wars: Shatterpoint leans into this category, focusing on accessible, tactical gameplay with minimal prep.

Most mechanic-focused games are going to try very hard to make the hobby parts of miniature gaming as painless as possible, even going so far as offering pre-constructed, pre-painted miniatures. The goal of a mechanic-focused game is not only to get you playing right away but more specifically to get you competing right away. Star Wars: X-Wing is a prime example of a game that took this to the furthest extreme. You need roughly 3-6 models, everything is pre-painted and assembled, and essentially you are ready to sign up for tournaments after the unboxing.

Side Note: Star Wars X-Wing has been discontinued by the publisher, but don’t fret, miniature games never truly die and X-Wing is no exception. Communities keep these games alive and there were so many products produced for X-Wing that there are more miniatures available for purchase today than there ever was when the game was still being published.

Mechanics-focused games often feel closer to board games than traditional miniature games, with precise, clearly defined rules that leave no room for “eyeballing it.” These games are generally much cheaper to get to the table while getting the intended full gaming experience.

Narratively Focused Games

Narratively focused games sit on the opposite end of the spectrum from mechanics-driven ones. These games aim to capture a feeling—bringing iconic franchises, historical moments, or unique settings to life in a cinematic way.

Balance and precision take a back seat to storytelling and thematic immersion. Instead of symmetrical matchups, expect scenario-driven play that tries to replicate key moments—whether they’re historical battles or epic fantasy showdowns.

Bolt Action is a fantastic example of a narratively driven game that hybrids a bit into the hobby-focused element. The point of Bolt Action is to create (or use) scenarios that depict historical battles, but the game is not about simulation or exacting rules, it’s about creating the atmosphere of a great action-war movie. It’s about the sensation at the table, the atmosphere of the setting, and quick execution. The extra effort to put together a nicely painted army and building nice terrain is to quench that creative appetite, though I would still argue it leans far more into the narratively driven games rather than the hobby-focused games.

Two great examples of Narrative-focused games are The Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game and Bolt Action. MESBG tries to replicate the lord of the Rings movies, while Bolt Action tries to replicate a movie version of historical World War II battles. In both cases, the games exaggerate the cinematic fantasy to bring the feel and style of their chosen setting to the table.

Understanding Your Interest In Miniature Games

Now that we’ve established a way to categorize games, the next step is figuring out how to use this information to guide your decision and ultimately select the right game for you.

You might already have a gut feeling based on the categories we’ve outlined, leaning more towards one over the others. Preferences are often instinctive and valid, but it’s important to remember that while most games lean toward a particular focus, they usually incorporate elements from all three categories. Even games with a clear identity—like Warhammer 40k being hobby-focused—venture into narrative and mechanics to some extent.

Choosing the right game is about balancing your interests with realistic expectations. To help narrow down your options, consider these three key factors:

Time & Money?

It’s easy to be drawn to what excites you most, but miniature games require a significant investment of both time and money.

Games generally fall into three price categories:

  • Cheap: Around $60-$100, comparable to the cost of a typical board game.
  • Standard: Ranging from $150-$250 for a full experience.
  • Expensive (a.k.a. “Go F* Yourself”)**: $500+ for the complete experience.
The BattleTech Alpha Strike box set is an outstanding value for a game, coming in on the “cheap” category, this box set costs about 90 dollars US and quite literally comes with more than what you need to play a full game. You can buy this box set, never buy any more stuff for Battletech, and play the game forever. This kind of value is rare in the miniature market, but if you love giant robot battles, you can’t do better than this.

Price is not the only consideration however, Battletech can take upwards of 6+ hours to play a single game, so you have to ask yourself that question too. Will you ever have time to play a 6+ hour game?

It’s worth noting that you can spend more or less on any game. For example, you could grab an intro set for Warhammer 40k at $50, but that won’t give you the full experience Games Workshop intends. On the flip side, a core set for Battletech at $90 can offer a well-rounded experience, though diving deeper could cost thousands.

Time commitment follows a similar pattern. You might grab an X-Wing starter set and be playing within minutes, while something like Warhammer Old World could demand 60+ hours of assembly and painting before your first match.

Infinity is a fantastic example of a game that respects your wallet and your time but still offers a very robust gaming experience with extreme collection and expansion opportunities. They do this through masterful design, ensuring that the game is every bit as exciting and fun on a smaller scale with simplified rules as it is with large scale and nearly bottomless rules expansion. A small game from a basic starter kit can cost less than 50 bucks to get into and offer a game session as short as 45 minutes, to larger scale and elaborate battles with deep rules that can cost hundreds of dollars to collect and create play times exceeding 5+ hours.

Some gamers (this one included) love games that have varying scales like this, it makes collection (acquisition) easier and you get to play as you collect, build, and expand. In my eyes, Infinity is one of the best miniature games out there, especially when it comes to respecting your time and money!

Many games market “quick start” options, but the reality is that each game has a clear overhead. Take the time to research what’s truly required to enjoy the full experience and compare it with your available resources.

Miniature Games are a group activity

No matter what game you choose, remember that miniature games are fundamentally social. While they can be enjoyed as a solo hobby (through collecting and painting), the core experience revolves around playing with others. Most games require at least two players, but the best experiences often come from being part of an active community.

Don’t have any friends to play miniature games with but you still want to get into it? Don’t worry, Warcrow Adventures has your back! Ok, I’m going to say this up front, games like Warcrow Adventures (just like any game) are always more fun when you have friends to share them with. But if you want to get into miniature games and you are living in isolation or simply don’t have anyone around to play with, Warcrow Adventures offers a fantastic game that can be played completely solo. It offers fantastic miniatures for you to paint and enjoy the hobby part of miniature gaming with expansion opportunity and because the game’s miniatures are directly connected to Warcrow the miniatures game, you could potentially in the future expand your collection to that game as well.

That said, I still think the best option is to find some friends to play games with, community is just a huge part of this hobby and often it almost doesn’t matter what miniature game you play, as long as you have people to play it with.

Before diving in, make sure your chosen game has a local presence. There’s nothing worse than investing time and money into a game you never get to play because no one else in your area is into it. Online communities can help bridge gaps, but nothing beats in-person matches and events. After all, if you’re going to invest time and money into building an army for a game, playing some digitized version of it is going to be very anticlimactic, don’t expect that sort of thing to fill any voids.

Competative or Casual

Some games are designed with competition in mind, while others lean into a more relaxed, narrative-driven approach. While this often aligns with a game’s core category, community culture can shift things in unexpected ways.

Take Warhammer 40k, for example—designed as a hobby-focused game, yet many local communities treat it as a highly competitive experience. Conversely, Star Wars: X-Wing, built for competition, has embraced the mantra “Fly Casual,” encouraging players to focus on enjoying the thematic experience rather than strict competitive play despite its clear design goals.

These community-driven shifts can be confusing for new players, so it’s crucial to research how a game is actually played in your area rather than relying solely on its marketing or official design.

The concept of the current state of the game as seen through the eyes of the community should be an important consideration when selecting your game. Marketing is one thing, game state is an altogether different thing. Take Warmachine for example. A few years back I would have recommended this game without hesitation, it was once, a fantastic game. Today I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy. Privateer Press has done a very poor job taking care of this game and it’s in terrible shape right now, unlikely to survive going forward. It’s a real mess!

It’s also worth noting that any game has a “current state” defined by the opinions of the community which defines the mood of the community. This is an important pulse to have your finger on, because the rules and governance of a game by it’s publisher can have a tremendous amount of impact on the game and the gaming community. It’s important to know that being negative gets more clicks, so look for positive feedback on any game you’re considering, but beware that every game has a “this game sucks” anti-fan club on social media.

The Miniature Games – Overviews!

I have already offered a bit of insight on a few games in the article, but I will do a few more here just to give you some ideas and inspiration for your own research, that said, here comes the golden advice.

DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
This is so critical to the process, before you whip out that credit card you should know everything there is to know about a game. Don’t go into miniature games likely, even the most basic game is going to demand a lot more from you than a typical board game, so miniature games should never be an impulse buy!

Star Wars Legion

It’s truly a rare gamer that I run into that doesn’t love Star Wars on some level and it’s natural for gamers to gravitate towards familiar franchises. As such, Star Wars Legion always comes up in conversations about miniature games because it is, in a nutshell, Star Wars on a grand scale.

In Star Wars Legion you are going to have mass battles on large battlefields with Jedi’s, AT-AT walkers and the countless troops each with their own personality from the Star Wars universe. Visually, it’s every kid’s dream to play Star Wars on this scale.

That said you have to be weary here. This hybrid game, has a heavy hobby element requirement, it’s quite expensive to get a full game on the table and the game state right now is a bit confusing.

It’s a great game, but be sure to check on the status of this game thoroughly and do some calculations. Once it’s all said and done you will spend a solid 300-400 dollars to get a complete army with many hours of hobby time to pull it all together. It requires a commitment!

Marvel Crisis Protocal

Like Star Wars Legion, the Marvel Universe has been popularized in recent years by the never-ending influx of Marvel movies, so gravitating towards a miniature game with all of your favorite superheroes is perfectly natural.

What you have to know about Marvel Crisis Protocol is that it’s a very structured mechanic-focused game with a very stern competitive style and objective-oriented game. This is not a narrative-focused game at all, it plays more like a board game than a miniature game. The scenarios in the game are just “adjective” driven excuses for what amounts to a game about holding objectives (positions) on the board.

It’s a fun and fantastic game, but be sure you match your expectations with the actual gameplay.

Wings of Glory

Speaking of managing expectations, let’s talk about Wings of Glory. As an avid historical war gamer, I love a good heavy war simulation, so one look at Wings of Glory and it is easy to get excited.

The important thing to know about Wings of Glory is that it’s not a simulation at all, in fact, this is the UNO of miniature games, one that can be taught to children. It does not take itself seriously, there is no hobby element (everything is pre-painted) and it’s not designed for narrative-focused play.

This is a very simple dog-fighting game, with board game-like mechanics. It’s light, fast and super fun, but this is not the historical simulator you might hope it would be.

Ok that’s it for today guys, I hope you found the article useful, good luck out there!

Gaming Articles, What Makes It Tick

Warhammer 40k: Scratching The Surface

From my last article you might have guessed that I have now committed myself to collecting, building and painting a Warhammer 40k army with the intent to join my friends on the Warhammer 40k, 10th edition adventure.

I thought it might be useful to share my experience for those out there either considering joining the hobby for the first time, or possibly someone like me returning to the game.

I will do things in Chronological order first and foremost, but I have snuck in a few sub-sections where I think they were relevant to the experience.

Enjoy!

What got me interested?

The truth is that I have always had an eye for Warhammer 40k, its one of my origin games. What I mean by that is that, this game, along with Dungeons and Dragons, Zelda on the 8 bit Nintendo and Magic: Gathering are all games that sort of drove my early days of gaming and made me the gaming nerd I am today.

Origin games are important, they define who we are as gamers and steer the ship. Its a rare case that I meet a gamer who can’t name their origin games with little effort. We all have them. For me, Zelda was, in a word, my childhood.

In many respects, Warhammer 40k is a nostalgia thing for me and over the years even as Warhammer 40k fell out of favor, as have most of the origin games to different degree’s, its always been on my radar.

The reality is however that 6th edition was the last version of the game I played. 7th, 8th and 9th edition all, in my observation where unanimously considered problematic. All the people I knew that continued to play Warhammer 40k, despite their participation where not advocates for the game. They all voiced a lot of negative opinions about Warhammer 40k to me, if the people playing your game aren’t advocates for you, that to me, is a clear sign that there is no reason to explore it any further.

6th edition Warhammer 40k was the last edition I played. It had many very frustrating issues and Games Workshop had a lot of really poor business practices that drove me away into the arms of better games and game companies.

10th edition Warhammer 40k however has been a very different story. Suddenly people who play the game have become advocates for it and the edition is spoken in high regard among 40k players in my circles. That got me interested enough to explore and ultimately try out the game.

I felt very strongly that the assessments and reviews of the game were quite on the money, Warhammer 40k was great again and I got very excited about the prospect of returning to one of my origin games and building a new army.

That is how it started, it was pretty straightforward. Make a great game and you can have my money!

Early Exploration

Despite my enthusiasm, I took a pretty cautious route at least, cautious by my definition. After playing a couple of games using borrowed armies I settled in for a lot of reading and research on which army I wanted to play.

This was actually a lot harder than I thought. In 10th edition all armies are currently indexed, which simply means that most armies don’t have a full codex, having been re-vamped for the new edition and all of their army rules where available online. Suffice to say there was a lot to review.

My decision wasn’t going to be made based on army strength or current meta, or anything like that. I did however want to make sure that the style of play I prefered was a core function of the army I chose.

Meta Watch and GW’s commitment to keeping an eye on the health of armies is a great initiative and I’m in full support, but I neither play competitive or even outside of my local gaming circles so this information really neither impacts me or is relevant in any way. It also doesn’t reflect the strengths and weaknesses of armies in my circles which are vastly different than what is shown here. Local metas rarely match up with the official results.

My prefered style of play was to effectively have a little bit of everything. I wanted good melee options and good shooty options, but I also knew going in that I wanted to have an army with a lot of models. This didn’t necessarily mean I wanted a swarm, but very early on I ruled out elite forces style armies and focused more on armies that would allow me to field more than your average model count.

Custodes is perhaps one of the most elite armies in the game and they are very attractive, both mechanically and with their visually stunning models. I was tempted, as having individual models that are super bad ass I can imagine is also a lot of fun. I stuck to my guns however, I wanted the table overflowing with my painted models so I had to rule these guys out early on.

This narrowed my choices down to one of the Space Marine chapters, though this was very tentative and I ruled it out quickly. Orks, which I thought where really cool but a friend of mine was already collecting these so it was ruled out on that basis alone. Necrons I considered, not so much because they were meeting my “more models” criteria but because this was the last army I collected when I quit the game. I ruled them out however for that reason, I had already collected them before and I wanted something new.

Serious contenders included Astra Militarum, Tau Empire and Tyranids. It was going to be a tough choice but ultimately my decision had a relatively smooth process of elimination. I excluded Astra Militarum mainly because its basically the “modern human military army” and it just didn’t feel science-fiction enough, the models essentially looked like a normal modern army.

Astra Militarum are really cool, but if you don’t look to close, you might think these were straight out of a world war II miniature game. They are just plain “army dudes” and while I think that is cool, I already actually have armies that look like this in my collection.

Both Tau Empire and Tyranids offered a lot to like. Tau Empire was about to get its updated codex which would likely include a lot of new models and updates, which was exciting. They also look amazing on the table with a mix of modern, Robotech style models and the primitive but equally awesome Kroot. I loved them and to be honest, I was really close to picking them outright.

In my opinion The T’au Kroot are the most visually unique and among the coolest looking models GW makes. These guys alone almost made the case for running a T’au army.

In the end however I chose Tyranids for three core reasons. First and most obvious is that I’m a huge Predator and Aliens fan and Tyranids are an amazing combination of both of those science-fiction tropes. There lore also intrigued, I love Starcraft lore and they had a similar science-fiction look and feel. The fact that they had a newly released codex was also a big factor, it meant I was effectively choosing a fully support army which could not be said about most of Warhammer 40k at this stage in the 10th edition lifespan. The final thing that really tipped it over the edge is that the new crusade rules focused on Tyranid lore and I found that really exciting.

I have no regret, picking Tyranids was an awesome decision that would turn out to have other cool benefits I would discover later on.

Buying Into Tyranids

Unfortunately I had missed the boat when it comes to Tyranids as the Leviathan Box Set was out of stock and would remain so, which most regarded as one of the best starter box sets ever made for the game and it was especially good for Tyranids. I got lucky however and I met a player who had already purchased the Leviathan starter set but he was a Space Marine player and wanted to shake the Tyranids side of the box set. I ended up getting all the Tyranid Leviathan models for next to nothing, leaving me with lots of cash burning in my hands to buy more stuff.

There is no question in my mind that Tyranids is one of the coolest factions in the Warhammer 40k universe. Ever since their conception way back in the day, I have mused about collecting them, so it’s great to finally do it!

I decided against however buying a whole bunch of plastic before I have had a chance to actually play with what I already had, as honestly I wasn’t sure what to buy.

I ended up buying a bunch of painting supplies after choosing my painting scheme (more on that later) and I purchased the Tyranid Codex, The Core Rulebook and the Tyrannic War, Crusade rules supplement.

These were all great purchases. The Tyranid Codex is filled to the brim with amazing lore, well organized army rules as well as a special Crusade Rules section specific to the army. I know that many people question the validity of purchasing codexes but in my opinion, if your going to buy the army, you should buy the codex. It’s just a really nice to have, its more of a collection and atmosphere thing than a nescessity.

The Core Rulebook too is kind of a luxury purchase and not a necessity. The Core Rules are available for free online and frankly even when you play the game, using the core rulebook at the table is not really all that practical thanks to great digital support apps. Still I thought this was a great buy, less so for the rules and more so for the lore and atmosphere. It’s just fun to have something to look at when you get that Warhammer feeling.

Crusade rules have been around in Warhammer 40k for a while, but the reality is that even back in the early days of 40k people would write stories and create campaigns for their battles. In many ways, Warhammer 40k is a sort of tactical role-playing game. Its lore and the story behind the miniature game is absolutely vital to its health and image. It’s why I’m such an advocate for the narrative style of play, in fact, it’s actually competitive match play that is a foreign concept to me.

The Crusade book was simultaneously the best and worst purchase. Again the expanded lore is so good, the crusade rules are absolutely fantastic, my favorite way to play so for me this was a must have. Unfortunately much of the book (more than half) was dedicated to content that already existed in the core rulebook, like the core rules themselves. I get why this was done, technically I could have gotten away with just purchasing this book without the core rulebook and had everything I needed to play a full crusade campaign. But just be aware that you end up with a lot of duplication between the books when purchasing them. It sort of felt like this content should have been in the core rulebook and in fact, if you managed to purchase the Leviathan core rulebook that came with the Leviathan starter set, this is exactly what you would get. I don’t know why the core rulebook and crusade rules were separated in this fashion in the standard rulebook given that using the Crusade system is in my opinion, a core and fundamental part of Warhammer 40k gameplay.

Getting Modern Supplies & Picking Paint Scheme

Most people when they paint their army are going to go with something close to or exactly as depicted for their army to match up with the lore and feel of the Warhammer 40k universe. One of the luxuries of the Tyranid army is that picking a unique, one of a kind paint scheme IS the appropriate lore way to approach it.

It was a lot of fun to muse about this but ultimately what I wanted to do was paint a Leviathan army, but I wanted it to be more gritty-fleshy-meaty and in some places more colorful. I ended up using the Leviathan paint scheme as inspiration to create a more realistic variant.

Contrast paints are effectively a magic bullet in the world of miniature painting today. We minimal technique, skill or effort you can create well defined and visibly appealing painted miniatures. With more advanced techniques or combining contrast painting with other more traditional techniques you can create an amazing painted army in a third of the time.

For that job I chose to do a combination of Contrast Painting, using a blending method, toned down and a bit darker colors with some occasional hyper fluorescent vibrant colors.

I was easily able to locate all the supplies I needed and I have to say that modern painting is not only much simpler and enjoyable to use. After painting a couple of models I started to get the techniques down and though I made plenty of mistakes, it was very easy to get my painting done in no time flat.

Small sample of my army. As you can see there are blending effects, a clear dedication to the Leviathan theme with my own little flavor. These miniatures did not take long to paint at all and thanks to contrast paints and basic techniques, it wasn’t really difficult. Believe me when I tell you that I have zero natural talent and everything I know, I learned while painting these miniatures. Its not an exaggeration to say that quite literally anyone can do it.

My army isn’t 100% done at this point, but other than minor, individual flares, I know I have the method and means to fully paint my army from this point forward and it did not take a tremendous effort to get here. Its a very comforting thought to know that I will be able to paint up my army exactly like I want, get it looking really nice in a reasonable amount of time.

To The Table and Beyond

The final step of my journey was to build an army list from my constructed models and get it to the table. Now initially I was actually quite nervous about this. Warhammer 40k is a fairly complex game so far as miniature games go and while I don’t think the Tyranids are a particularly complex army to run, they do have some key synergies and a very defined style of play which requires a bit of finesse and understanding.

My first game was a 600 point match vs. Dark Angels in which I fully expected to be crushed relentlessly. It turned out that my Tyranids held up pretty well, the game went 5 rounds with a final score of 48 to 46 with Dark Angels coming out on top.

Dark Angels is another army with a released codex in 10th edition. They look amazing and my friend who is running them, loves them. He is also our best player, undefeated in our circle, which makes this the strongest army in our meta. Not so in the official meta, in fact, many argue they are terrible. Which makes the case that, what is happening at official tournaments and what’s happening at your local tables is not likely to line up.

It was a tight game from start to finish, with tons of epic moments, terrible loses and heroic triumphs. It was everything I wanted out of Warhammer 40k and more.

It was a messy game of course, I spent a lot of my time asking questions, looking up rules and trying to remember all the stuff my army could do, but I was fortunate enough to have a gracious opponent who advised me well and patiently let me figure things out. The game took more than 4 hours from start to finish and while I felt that this was pretty long for a single game my opponent assured me that games could range from 2 to 5 hours depending on the point count and circumstances of the game itself.

This means to me that Warhammer 40k is always going to border on an event style feel, which is fine by me. It means I will probably get to play less often, but the games themselves will be more memorable. More reason while I want to play this game using the Crusade rules. If we are going to spend that much time on a single match, I want it to have meaning beyond the match itself which is exactly what Crusade rules allow you to do.

My second match was against another novice player running Adepta Sororitas, aka The Battle Sisters. My friend had only recently bought into Warhammer 40k along with me and he only had a combat patrol army, which gave me an opportunity to try out The Combat Patrol rules.

Another really amazing army, these Battle Sisters look absolutely awesome on the table. Some of the models and the lore behind them especially is bizzare, its some of the craziest shit I have read in science-fiction for a very long time.

This match up probably would have been a lot tighter had my opponent had a better understanding of his army, but as a new player myself, I knew even less about The Battle Sisters than he did so I unlike my first experience against a veteran player, my opponent was not getting any of the clever advice I was guided by in my first game.

I didn’t exactly crush him, but the end score was 15 to 35 for the Tyranids which when you get right down to it, meant I had nearly doubled my opponents score. Suffice to say my opponent forgot to use a lot of special rules and strategies typical for the Battle Sisters and I think had he employed some of these advantages the game would have been a lot closer.

The Combat Patrol rules themselves where really not any different than the standard rules, certainly not enough to make a notable difference from my perspective. The biggest change was to the Detachment rules, which were unique for Combat Patrol for both armies and the units themselves which were slightly altered (In some cases better in others worse than their core rule counterparts).

There was also a static secondary objective each army chose from at the start of the match, rather than the more dynamic drawn secondary objectives of the full game.

It was a great match, very relaxed and it gave me an opportunity to try out some new strategies with different units.

The main take away from both of these matches was that the Tyranids have a lot of flexibility as individual units, meaning their roles aren’t super fixed and this army is also really great a board control.

I wish I had more, but my experience is so shallow at the moment with this game and this army, that I’m not sure I could come to any further conclusions. I do have some preferences however.

What I like and dislike about my army

I’m mostly positive about my army, all my units felt strong or alternatively useful in some capacity. While there are clearly some roles certain units have in the army, I think its big strength is the flexibility of the units.

For example The Von Ryan Leapers have many useful talents that allow them to serve multiple roles depending on the situation. They can be an advance force to slow an advance, a great melee aggressor, a unit used to steal objectives opponents in their backline and my favorite, a ploy to draw attention away from something else I’m trying to achieve by simply being a menace on the board my opponent must deal with.

I will say in both games this unit died very early on, so I may not be using it quite right, but I have enjoyed their antics.

Most of the units have a similar duality.

There is some stuff that even as a newbie to the game and army I found on. One example that sticks out like a sour thumb is the Winged Alpha Prime which is a fast moving, flying, melee leader unit. The weird thing is that they can lead other units, namely Gargoyles and Tyranid Warriors but they don’t seem to mess with either of these units particularly well.

He is a poor fit for the Gargoyle unit since the last thing you want to do with those is get into a melee fight, they are a shooty unit if they fight at all. Equally poor are the Tyranid Warriors who have half the speed of the Alpha Prime, forcing it to give up its main advantage, speed.

Strangely as a solo unit, even at its low point cost it’s not terribly useful. It’s a very strange unit, I haven’t really figured out what I’m supposed to do with as it doesn’t seem to fit any role particularly well, being a stark opposite to the rest of the army.

Grant it oddities like that are fairly rare, but there are some I think are quite obvious.

Conclusion

So far I have to admit I’m really enjoying it and I’m really enjoying the fact that I’m enjoying. What I mean by that is, I think, to some degree, I thought the hype and novelty was going to be short lived and the reality of playing a GW game was going to set it.

What has happened is that the game has surprised me at every turn.

The books are great, GW’s commitment to the game is surprising, the game rules are really well put together, with a couple of exception, the vast majority of the units in my army are very playable. Its really well put together product.

I talked about the expense of the game in my previous article so I won’t re-hash it hear, but he point stands. Its an expensive hobby, but Warhammer 40k has not been more expensive than other games I have collected. Not trying to understate the cost here, its ridiculous, but Im just saying its not more ridiculous than anything else.

Its been a fantastic trip down memory lane, but that memory has been re-written, revised and re-released. Hands down, 10th edition is the best edition of Warhammer 40k to date. Well done GW!

Gaming Articles, On The Table, What Makes It Tick

Songs of Ice and Fire: Season 4 – Targaryan Tactics Deck

Some of the long-time readers of this blog may know that I’m a big fan of The Songs of Ice and Fire miniature game and that I play the Targaryan faction. For quite a while this was a high-profile game in my local gaming group to the point that I was writing strategy articles on this site for the game. Unfortunately, the game sort of died a while back for us because frankly most of us felt like that while the core game was great, the balancing of the game in too many areas was atrocious. To such an extreme that it sort of sucked up all our desire and energy to keep playing.

Fast forward to 2024 and at the start of the year Season 4 of SOIAF has started with all new updates to all the factions, with lots of balancing and fine-tuning of the game. A perfect opportunity (hopefully) to get back into the game we know and love.

It’s a pretty big update and I thought it would be fun to revive articles on this blog that focus on strategy, tactics, list building, and the game as a whole.

Now mind you I’m not a competitive player, I play miniature games for fun, but I enjoy theory crafting and writing articles about my hobby so consider these articles to be from a guy who just likes playing games, less so a serious tournament player. I would imagine most competitive players would have a lot more to say, but I think most people who play this game are going to be more like me, excited fans rather than hardcore competitive players.

Today we are going to get very specific and talk about the base Targaryan Tactics Deck. The tactics deck is a key element of every army, a foundational advantage that dictates a lot of the very specialized things you can do and drives the strategy of your army. It’s, in a word, a key element of an army and to understand the strengths and weaknesses of any given unit you need to understand how that interacts with the tactics deck.

If you’re a Targaryen player, this article is for you! Let’s get into it.

Overrun

Overrun is a pretty niche card that plays well into the Targaryan army general strategic core which is driven by highly mobile units, especially calvary that outflank opponents to devastating effect.

In short, as a Targaryan player, you should always be the one doing the charging, not the other way around. In a way you know that you have learned to use the army well when you no longer find your mobile units getting charged in all but the rarest of circumstances.

Overrun plays off the assumption that you will be successful and in the event you wipe a unit off the table (hopefully a frequent occurrence), this card allows you to either make a second charge or perform a big march move to get yourself into position for a future charge.

If you have the horse NCU spot (which you should and will prioritize most of the time), you get the bonus of this card of being able to re-roll your charge dice allowing you to improve your odds of taking a riskier (longer-range) charge.

This card falls into the category of niche, but powerful. It’s niche because it requires a lot of very clever setup and a bit of luck to pull off. You can’t control the dice, so you’re never going to know for sure if your charge is going to yield the condition (wiping a unit) you need to play the card. Not only must you first destroy a unit to play this card, triggering a surge forth, but you have to have the opportunity for another charge or be facing in the direction you would want to march and be in a position where making a charge or marching somewhere is a good idea. All circumstances are difficult to control and very conditional on what is happening on the table.

My experience with this card is that the conditions to pull it off don’t come up that often and unlike many cards in the deck, you have considerably less control over creating the right conditions.

This means that this card is unlikely to be useful early in the game, turn 1 and 2, you will rarely kill any units outright, making this a turn 3+ card. Additionally, this card does not have any alternative effects like some of the cards do which means that after you draw it, to use it you need to create the rare circumstances to be able to play it and while setting that up which may take a couple of rounds, you are occupying that all-important card slot in your hand of cards.

This is a really good card don’t get me wrong but in my experience, the chances of you getting to use it to good effect that will have the strong impact it suggests is very slim. It’s a rarely played card and most of the time you are chucking it hoping to replace it with something more immediately useful. One of the core concepts of the tactics deck is that you should be going through it during the game. Holding on to cards is not a good strategy ever, you want to be smoking your hand and drawing a new one every round.

What is worse is that only one of the two calvary commanders gets this card in their deck (Khal Drago), as it is excluded from Jorah Mormont (Westerosi Tactician Cavalry) and it is for Calvary units that you want to play this card for as they are your best offensive weapons. Add injury to insult, The Mother of Dragons also loses this card, which sucks for those dragon lists.

Verdict: 3 out of 5 stars

While very strong when you get the opportunity to use it, its niche requirements are difficult to set up making this one of the weaker cards in the Targaryan tactics deck overall. The fact that you can’t combo it with key commanders makes it that much less useful.

That said I’m glad it’s in the deck. It’s kind of a strange circumstance because while you rarely get to use it, when you do, it can be a game-changing moment. I wish this had a draw card replacement effect so that you can chuck it when table conditions aren’t ripe for it. Suffice it to say I have won games on a single play of this card, so the impact when executed is very strong.

Good, but hard to use card.

Sudden Retreat

One of the tactical cores of the Targaryen army is that you are really strong on the charge, but not great when it comes to battles of attrition. Targaryans are well-equipped to outflank, so after you flank-charge, a card that lets you escape once you have done your thing is very welcome in the deck and that is exactly what Sudden Retreat lets you do.

With this card you will never need to take more than one attack if you don’t want to once you get into a melee.

It’s a pretty easy card to use which is really great and especially effective thanks to the high mobility of calvary units which are usually who you will save this card for.

Unfortunately this card, like overrun, is the elimination card for one of two of your cavalry commanders. It particularly sucks that Jorah Mormont is the one that keeps it and it’s Khal Drago that loses it. It is in fact Khal Drago that would most benefit from this card as this is the best calvary commander at least currently for the Targaryans.

Fortunately this card combos well with other units in the Targaryen army, it’s fantastic on Pikemen, especially when comboed with Unsullied Officers for example who love to be charged, so you want to get them out of combat.

Verdict: 4 out of 5 stars

It’s a good card, but its purpose is escape, which doesn’t make it a power play thing, more of a utility thing. The fact that one of the two cavalry commanders (your best commander) loses it is a bummer but unlike overrun, it’s easy to use and useful in a lot of situations.

I like to keep this card when drawn in the early rounds and setup a situation to use it as post retreat you are often in a position an opponent did not expect you to be and most armies are not as mobile as yours.

Swift Reposition

This card can be extremely useful in a lot of circumstances, but in a Targaryen army very often it’s redundant thanks to your already amazing mobility. Frankly getting an extra 2-3 inches of movement is pretty amazing in a game where inches matter as much as they do in ASIOAF, I would imagine almost game-breaking in a lot of armies, but in a Targaryen army it’s handy, but not quite as impactful.

It can come in handy for getting that extra range for when you want to get archers into a better position or make a charge somewhere your opponent thinks you’re out of range to attempt or sliding onto an objective, or slipping out of the way of the line of sight. Lots of fun utilities that can create very nasty surprises. The problem is that you usually don’t have issues pulling things like that off with the Targaryen units anyway. You are already crazy mobile.

I find I use this card more often on infantry units, it’s particularly nasty on Unsullied Swordsmen. Most of the time I wind up using this card to slip into objectives

Verdict: 4 out of 5 stars

Even though Targaryans don’t need even more mobility options most of the time, this is an exceedingly useful card that your opponents are going to hate because it makes pre-measuring carefully and trying to avoid Targaryan charges and being outflanked that much more difficult.

It’s quite devastating against slow-moving armies and especially effective in lists where you out-activate your opponent.

Fire and Blood

I love cards with options, the flexibility to adapt a card to a situation rather than trying to create a situation for a card is so much more useful.

Fire and Blood is a straight-up “I get some extra shit” card that is focused on letting you do more damage, so it’s great. The fact that you get a bonus for horses plays into what you are going to be doing anyway, so most of the time getting the double benefit is pretty easy to setup.

Sundering and Vicious I think are the two best benefits you can have on a charge, especially when you are usually already outflanking opponents.

This card when used on a flank charge of a calvary unit with the horses is devastating, it all but guarantees the destruction of multiple ranks.

Verdict: 5 out of 5 stars

Versatile, easy to use and powerful with literally no drawbacks. All the good commanders get to keep it. It’s without question a top-tier card for the Targaryans, you will use it in every game. If it has any drawbacks it’s the fact that some of your units already get Sundering or Vicious anyway, but in a way that is also a plus as it means you don’t have to rely in those cases on the horse to get both benefits.

Field Control

This is a multi-use card with a lot of utility and it has a very sneaky bonus effect that isn’t written on the card.

The first part, using the horse NCU yourself effectively makes this an improved version of the horses, both when maneuvering and retreating, with a bonus effect on the retreat. Very useful.

The alternative effect; when an enemy grabs the horse NCU from you, it lets you perform a 3′ shift. The key here is the timing, as this shift takes place after the enemy resolution, so you effectively get to do an extra 3-inch move with a unit prior to taking your turn. This can be used to absolutely devastating effect when timed right.

The sneaky effect of this card is that your opponent is going to want to steal that horse NCU spot from you since you gain so much benefit from it in your tactics deck, it’s a common action taken at the start of a round when your opponent goes first. I find that players often don’t think about the existence of this card, make a very calculated move to position themselves for some future move, and then boom out of nowhere you have a calvary able to do a 3-inch move, then on your turn, that same calvary makes a 6-inch free maneuver and then they can move or march or charge another 6 to 12 inches. You can potentially charge a unit with relative ease up to 15 inches away and march as far as 21 inches!

It’s bonkers and you will find that when an opponent see’s such a move one time they will never feel safe again.

Verdict: 5 out of 5 stars

This card is a combination of an improvement of an NCU spot and a swift reposition built into one card and can even be combined with a swift reposition to get a unit a free 6-inch move before your opponent can do anything thanks to the timing of the card.

When people say the Targaryans are a mobile force, this is what they are talking about!

Unstoppable Advance

This two-part card is sort of the Targaryan middle-of-the-road card.

For the first part of the the card, re-rolling charge distance dice, while nice in niche situations, the truth of the Targaryen armies is that as a general rule, charge distance is not normally a problem. Most of the time you are just trying not to roll a 1 so you don’t lose your bonus and I suppose it helps in that situation. There is some use occasionally for it, especially when using infantry units or neutrals. It’s a luxury item and not really what makes this card pop.

The real juice of the card is the surge forth ability. A +3 to maneuvering is huge but the secondary part, weakening everything in the short range is golden. Not only can you get the unit into the action but you are going to be facing an enemy force full of weakened conditions.

Surge Forth requires you to make a kill, which means it has the same problem as Overrun so not a great card to draw early.

Verdict: 3 out of 5 stars

Decent card, I docked it because the first ability is only marginally useful to Targaryans and the second ability has a pretty specific trigger that you don’t have full control of and doesn’t come up that often. Most of the time when you draw this card you are probably going to toss it unless the table situation has circumstances that might allow you to leverage it.

When executed, it’s devastating much like overrun.

Blood of the Dragon

I love “start of any turn” triggers as they are extremely easy to use and easy to plan your actions around.

This card is great to draw early in the round but tends to be considerably less useful in later rounds, but it comes with two effects and you are almost certain to lose units in every match to collect the bonuses.

An additional attack die is always welcome as is the -1 wound from failing panic tests. It’s a straightforward card, not powerful but not weak, kind of a middle-of-the-road bonus. The only trick to it is to simply get it into play as soon as possible.

It is a shittier version of a tactic card other factions have like Starks which has a kind of “feel bad” to it.

Verdict: 3 out of 5 stars

Decent card that gives you a couple of basic bonuses, a consolation prize for losing a unit. If the bonus is stacked with additional tokens this card would be a lot better, but as is, it’s best described as easy to use with a decent effect. Nothing too extraordinary.

Conclusion

The Targaryen tactics deck has always been universally considered to be one of the weaker, if not THE weakest deck in Songs of Ice and Fire in the past and looking at the updates they have made since launch, I’m fairly sure that is still true in such a comparison.

Looking at the tactics deck cards in isolation, the effects are great and they work well with the general core concepts of the Targaryen army, creating strong synergies and sticking to the theme.

It’s only when you start comparing the Targaryan deck to other factions is when you realize just how weak the effects are comparatively and I think it’s here that the Targ deck’s reputation comes from.

When speaking to the balance of the game as a whole, I’m not sure a comparison of tactics decks is particularly useful however and I have always felt like this reputation, while technically probably true, didn’t really say much about the game.

The Targaryen army is very strong in my opinion and very competitive, but it’s filled with subtle complexity which can be difficult to get your head around. As such I find it performs generally far below its strength when looking at stats as it is a lot less forgiving of mistakes and it’s unique in a lot of ways, meaning usual tactics associated with other armies don’t perform well when applied to Targaryans. They have a very different and very specific way they must be played and the tactics deck is built around that specific playstyle.

The point here is that the Targaryan tactics deck is very strong, in the Targaryen army and while it doesn’t appear as strong when tactic decks are compared, within the Targaryan strategy, these effects are very potent.

I think if you asked any player of any faction what they think about their tactics deck they would all come up with a list of winners and losers in their deck. I think the Targ deck is unique in that there are no outright bad cards. There are cards that are niche and very situational, some cards that can feel redundant some of the time, but generally good all around.

I have my beef with some of the commander tactics cards, but that is for a future article. As far as the Targaryen season 4 tactic deck goes, it gets a nod of approval from me. Well done!

What Makes It Tick

What Makes It Tick: ASOIAF: Targaryen – Jorah Mormont

A song of Ice and Fire the miniature game is back in my gaming group with a vengeance and while I had planned a What Makes It Tick series on the game for quite a while, I have not pulled the trigger until now. Today we start the series that will take a deep dive into the Targaryen faction (my faction) in hopes of expanding the series to eventually go through the entire army. Enjoy!

We begin the series with Jorah Mormont a Commander, An Attachment and a Solo Unit in the Targaryen army. Now before I begin, let me just say that sometimes in miniature games there is a phenomenon known as “One Good Wayism”, which is similar to the concept of “competitive meta”, except unlike in the competitive meta which is what players do more based on tested reality, “One Good Wayism” is when players do something on pure perception.

In ASOIAF the miniature game, while there definitely is a competitive meta and this drives how people play the game, how they build list and pick factions, the truth about the ASOIAF community is that a lot of how the community operates is simply based on perceptions rather than the meta realities. I bring this up because Jorah Mormont is definitely a really strong case for how true this really is.

Commander Jorah Mormont – Westerosi Tactician Cavalry

Jorah Mormont is a cavalry commander that fits neatly into the Targaryen theme as a fast-moving, hard-hitting, flanking army. With the 2021 update, Jorah Mormont however has not fared particularly well in competitive play sitting in the 34th spot out 88 commanders overall on ASOIAF stats but in second to last place in the Targaryen faction.

Certainly, the competitive meta is not something to be ignored entirely, there is usually a good reason for a commander’s position in the rankings, but it’s my opinion that Jorah is actually one of the most underrated commanders in the Targaryen faction, perhaps even the game. I think his position among Targaryen commanders is directly linked to the fact that Jorah Mormont – The Wandering Knight (solo) is perceived as so good, that most players favor using Jorah as a solo rather than a commander or anything else for that matter. In fact, this would probably be how I personally favor using Jorah best as well, so I think the stats reflect this, but I think this definitely falls into the category of “One True Wayism”.

This perception of how to use Jorah (as a solo) is so strong that this commander unit is practically ignored entirely and it’s a real shame.

As a commander, Jorah is actually pretty fantastic, without question one of the strongest commanders in the faction. His Ambush ability is pretty amazing as weakened protects the unit during counter-attack and panic helps to increase the chances your opponent will fail their panic test, a great combo. Given your already charging from the flank or rear as a strategy in general, you are also likely making a pretty strong attack with any one of the Targaryen Cavalry units.

This ability is made ridiculously lethal and potentially game-changing thanks to the potential of combining it with one of Jorah’s fantastic tactic cards, Feinting Maneuver. This is arguably one of Jorah’s best tactic cards, perhaps even one of the best Targaryen tactic cards as a whole.

It cannot be understated what a massive difference there is between charging someone from the rear instead of a flank or a flank instead of the front and the fact that you can do this with a card is just absolutely devastating. One well-timed play of this card can and often will be a total game-changer.

Stubborn Tenacity is just a sort of sugar on top kind of ability for Jorah, great to have but nothing to get too excited. Most important thing is to remember to use it.

Marshal to me however is one of the most universally useful cards in Jorah’s tactic deck because while Feinting Maneuver is amazing on the offensive, one thing about running Cavalry as the Targaryens is that you really need them to be attacking at full ranks, this is so key to the game and to the Targaryen Cavalry strategy. One of the simplest way to declaw the Targaryen Cavalry lists is to simply take the money bags away from a Targ opponent to prevent the 3 wounds heal. This secret in the sauce is often ignored by less experienced players who are eager to steal the horse NCU spot, but the truth is if you really want to hurt the Targ. Cavalry, prevent them from healing 3 wounds.

This is why Mopatis is an auto-add for any Cavalry list, but Marshal not only doubles down on this by giving you a second out it does so as part of the activation. You have to remember that Targaryen Cavalry loses a lot of steam when they lose a rank and Marshal allows you to heal and still act. With cards like Swift Reposition and Sudden Retreat, you have alternative options for additional movement to your free maneuver anyway, so losing it is not the end of the world and these cards can combine to create some real surprises for your opponent.

Betrayal is also a truly amazing late-game card that can turn a game your opponent thinks is going to end the next round into something you win this round. Those end game situations which come up often where the score is tight and you are sitting on 7-9 points and you’re just trying to squeeze out those end game points to end things early, this card is perfect for. Don’t ever discard this one, once you draw it you want to keep it! This, just like the first two cards we talked about is a game-winning card.

You don’t want to pull the trigger on this one too early however, there is no way out of the Betrayal card once it’s on you.

Opportunist is one of the weaker cards in Jorah’s deck, though notably still among the strong general commander cards in the game. This is the chink in the armor, yet is still pretty strong. Certainly gaining Precision or Vicious on any attack is always a bonus but truth is that with a typical Calvary list you are trying to stall quite a bit, its always best to attack later in the round rather than early in the round to avoid potential counter-charges and extra retaliatory strikes against your units. Hence this card kind of works opposite to your standard strategy.

I find in general, just like the Cutthroat’s ability Ruthless Aggression ability, attacking someone before they have activated is never ideal and I just don’t think precision carries that much weight statistically so you are likely going to choose vicious for most occasions. It’s a very useful card, but I personally use it the round I draw it or toss it if I don’t, just about any other card draw in your deck will get you more mileage.

Jorah as a commander is clearly tailor-made for a Cavalry list, remember that Marshel only works with Cavalry units and if you are going to eat a Betrayal card you will want it on something that can get the hell out of dodge (aka a fast-moving cavalry).

Arguably both Opportunist and Feinting Maneuver are useful on infantry units, in particular, something like Unsullied Swordmasters combined with a Feinting Maneuver are absolutely devastating. Generally, though I think Jorah and a heavy-handed cavalry force is the most bang for your buck.

As a commander, I would personally rank him much higher than where he sits in ASOIAF stats, especially in the Targaryen faction, but I’m not at all surprised to see him as low as he is and the reason for that as mentioned is Jorah’s solo variant and this perception that the solo is so good, that you favor it over taking Jorah as a commander.

Jorah Mormont – The Wandering Knight (solo)

There is no doubt in my mind that Jorah Mormont (solo) is one of the most versatile and useful units in the Targaryen faction. The 3-point cost alone is worth the extra activation for a Calvary unit with a move of 6 that can control objectives. The fact that Jorah has a great moral score means simply Crowning him to death is unlikely so as long as you keep him out of harm’s way even without Scout Openings he is a worthwhile investment.

Scout Openings however takes this unit over the top in particular in a calvary heavy force that is reliant on charging but can and often does get stuck in unwanted melee brawls. Precision is a nice bonus but it’s the re-rolls you want and that ability means Jorah far exceeds his cost in value. The potential of a well-timed attack with Scout Openings leading the way can be devastating.

Use him to hold objectives, use him for Scout Openings, and use him as a blocker during those final end game moments.

It’s true he might die unexpectedly and this will happen. Your opponents are going to be highly motivated to kill him, it’s a pretty easy victory point and activation reduction for them if they can trap him, but if you use Jorah well and extra cautiously, he is amazing and is worth keeping alive just for the activation and objective control.

One of my favorite things to do with Jorah in the early or late game is to use him as bait. It never ceases to amaze me what risks and foolish plays players will make to try to kill Jorah and at 3 points he is worth trading up for just about any unit in the game.

Jorah Mormont – The Exiled Knight (Attachment)

At 2 points I find the Jorah Mormont – The Exiled Knight attachment to be extremely circumstantial and a bit difficult to use. The keyword for this unit is “Start of an enemy turn“. If it was any turn, then this would be a force to be reckoned with but doing it on an enemy turn makes this a defensive play typically or potentially a setup for a charge on your turn. Personally, I have found this one to be quite awkward to set up and use, in particular with attentive opponents.

I also find it’s a kinda dirty attachment with its timing, one of those things your opponents might forget and you try to surprise them with it “aha, I shift 3 inches”, but the timing is important here. You have to do it before they choose a unit to activate, so what is more likely to happen is that you forget to use this one rather than the other way around and your opponent forgets you have it.

I think there is potential for this attachment but I think it falls into that expert player area where you really need to know what you are doing to leverage it. I have never had much luck with it, but don’t let that fool you into thinking it’s bad, It’s just tricky to use I think.

Jorah Mormont – The Andal (Attachement)

The other 2 point attachment (infantry) of Jorah is a bit more straightforward. Both abilities are extremely useful and pretty easy to use.

Martial Training is just straight up awesome on, well pretty much anything that doesn’t already have re-rolls as a unit. The combination of re-rolling and Vulnerable is just straight-up beast mode. Typically I think this attachment is best on scrappy units that want to stay and fight like Unsullied Pikemen, but strictly speaking, all infantry units become considerably more dangerous when they can re-roll dice and hand out vulnerable when they are engaged in a fight.

Stand Your Ground! on the other hand, while really good on paper gets less use than you might think. It’s great when it goes off, but infantry units rarely just stand around and fight without being attacked by something else, there is always a catalyst of charges and counter-charges in fights. It’s a great ability, but this card is worth 2 points just for Martial Training to be frank, Stand your Ground is just extra value and it’s very welcome.

Jorah Mormont – Penitent Betrayer

What I like to call “The Forgotten Attachment”, Penitent Betrayer can only be used when it’s added to a unit with Daenerys Targaryen. This is a one-shot, one-point attachment that I can only describe as circumstantial at best. Under the right conditions, it can be extraordinarily useful, other times it’s just kind of meh.

It’s nothing you can plan around, favorable conditions to use him will either come up or they won’t, but given that typically using Daenery’s means dragons, odds are that whatever list you are building is going to be tight on points anyway so even for 1 point it can be a tough sell.

Conclusion

Personally, I think Jorah Mormont is a highly underrated commander and very underutilized outside of his Solo variant for one very, hard to argue reason. That solo is amazing and it’s really hard to pass on a 3 point activation that can do so much for so little. We have currently no cheap alternatives for activation outside of the very peculiar Freed Men which I don’t think can hold even a dim candle to our mounted friend.

The fact that we have a really great alternative cavalry commander in Khal Drogo, makes this decision point that much easier. In a sense with Khal Drogo and Jorah Mormont (Solo) you can have your cake and eat it too and I think that is both the best way to utilize Jorah and simultaneously why his popularity as a commander is so low in the ASOIAF stats.

I don’t see that changing anytime in the near future, the entire Jorah package’s fate was sealed by the Jorah solo unit, it’s just too damn good!